Animalia Norwegian Meat and Poultry Research Centre, P. O. Box 396 Økern, 0513 Oslo, Norway.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Mar 15;146(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
Although hot water pasteurisation of carcasses is accepted as a general intervention in USA, this is not the case in Europe. The aims of this study were (i) to evaluate the microbiological effects of hot water pasteurisation of lamb carcasses, both after slaughtering and dressing and following subsequent chilling and storage; (ii) to discuss hot water pasteurisation from a public health and cost-benefit perspective; (iii) to discuss the benefits of hot water pasteurisation compared with use of separate meat processing streams for high-risk carcasses; (iv) to evaluate the use of recycled hot water in a hygienic context and in relation to EU regulations; and (v) to consider the technological and sensory aspects of hot water pasteurisation of lamb carcasses. Samples were collected from 420 naturally contaminated lamb carcasses, with 50% of the carcasses (n=210) subject to hot water pasteurisation at 82 °C for 8s immediately after slaughter. Surface swab samples from 4500 cm² areas on carcasses were collected at slaughter, after chilling for 24 h, and after chilling for five days. The microbial analyses included Escherichia coli, Enterobacteriaceae, Bacillus cereus, Clostridium perfringens and aerobic plate count (APC). A resuscitation step using Tryptone Soya Agar was included in the microbiological analyses. Hot water pasteurisation significantly reduced the levels of E. coli, Enterobacteriaceae, B. cereus and APC (all P<0.001). E. coli colony forming unit (CFU) reduction was 99.5%, corresponding to a reduction of 1.85 log CFU per carcass. E. coli was isolated from 66% of control carcasses and from 26% of pasteurised carcasses. After 24h storage, the reduction in E. coli was increased to 2.02 log, and after five days E. coli could not be isolated from the pasteurised carcasses. These results suggest that surface pasteurisation could be an important and efficient procedure (critical control point) for reducing generic E. coli and thereby shiga toxin-producing E. coli on carcasses, and thus the risk for disease among consumers. The recycled water had acceptable physical and chemical parameters and no spore-forming bacteria were detected. Although some carcass discolouration was observed, after 24h the colour was acceptable. Our data provide relevant input for some of the data gaps regarding hot water pasteurisation and indicate that replacing the expensive system of separate processing of high-risk carcasses with hot water surface pasteurisation should be considered as a serious option.
尽管在美国,对胴体进行热水巴氏杀菌被认为是一种常规干预措施,但在欧洲并非如此。本研究的目的是:(i)评估在屠宰和去毛后,以及随后的冷却和储存过程中,对羔羊胴体进行热水巴氏杀菌的微生物学效果;(ii)从公共卫生和成本效益的角度讨论热水巴氏杀菌;(iii)讨论与使用高风险胴体的单独肉类加工流相比,热水巴氏杀菌的好处;(iv)评估在卫生方面和与欧盟法规相关的情况下,重复使用热水的情况;(v)考虑对羔羊胴体进行热水巴氏杀菌的技术和感官方面。从 420 只自然污染的羔羊胴体中采集样本,其中 50%(n=210)的胴体在屠宰后立即用 82°C 的热水进行巴氏杀菌 8 秒。在屠宰时、冷却 24 小时后和冷却 5 天后,从胴体 4500 cm² 面积上采集表面拭子样本。微生物分析包括大肠杆菌、肠杆菌科、蜡样芽孢杆菌、产气荚膜梭菌和需氧平板计数(APC)。微生物分析中包括使用胰蛋白胨大豆琼脂的复苏步骤。热水巴氏杀菌显著降低了大肠杆菌、肠杆菌科、蜡样芽孢杆菌和 APC 的水平(均 P<0.001)。大肠杆菌的菌落形成单位(CFU)减少了 99.5%,相当于每只胴体减少 1.85 个对数 CFU。未经巴氏杀菌的胴体中大肠杆菌的分离率为 66%,而巴氏杀菌的胴体中大肠杆菌的分离率为 26%。24 小时储存后,大肠杆菌的减少量增加到 2.02 个对数,5 天后,巴氏杀菌的胴体中无法分离出大肠杆菌。这些结果表明,表面巴氏杀菌可能是一种重要且有效的程序(关键控制点),可降低胴体上的一般大肠杆菌和产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的数量,从而降低消费者患病的风险。回收水具有可接受的物理和化学参数,并且没有检测到产芽孢细菌。尽管观察到一些胴体变色,但 24 小时后颜色是可以接受的。我们的数据为有关热水巴氏杀菌的一些数据空白提供了相关信息,并表明用昂贵的高风险胴体单独处理系统代替热水表面巴氏杀菌应该被视为一个可行的选择。