U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, USA.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Apr;37(4):580-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
Thermal dose is the most generally accepted concept for estimating temperature-related tissue damage thresholds in high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) procedures. However, another approach based on the intensity-time product I t(m) =D has been used, where D is a tissue-dependent damage threshold, I is the spatial-peak, temporal-average intensity and t is time. In this study, these two approaches were compared analytically by substituting a well-known soft-tissue solution for temperature vs. time into the thermal dose equation. From power law fits of I vs. t, m was found to fall between about 0.3 and 0.8. In terms of the intensity required for cell death for a given exposure time, the standard deviation of the error between the full thermal-dose formulation and the I t(m) =D prediction based upon the power-law fit was less than 5% for focal beam diameters up to 3 mm. Thus, for the practical range of HIFU parameters examined, the intensity-time product relationship is equivalent to the thermal dose formulation.
热剂量是估计高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)治疗中与温度相关的组织损伤阈值的最常用概念。然而,另一种基于强度-时间乘积 I t(m) =D 的方法也被使用,其中 D 是组织依赖性损伤阈值,I 是空间峰值、时间平均强度,t 是时间。在这项研究中,通过将已知的软组织温度与时间的解代入热剂量方程,对这两种方法进行了分析比较。从 I 与 t 的幂律拟合中发现,m 介于 0.3 到 0.8 之间。就给定暴露时间的细胞死亡所需的强度而言,基于幂律拟合的 I t(m) =D 预测与完整热剂量公式之间的误差标准差小于 5%,对于焦点光束直径高达 3 毫米。因此,在检查的实际 HIFU 参数范围内,强度-时间乘积关系等同于热剂量公式。