Suppr超能文献

荷兰居家姑息镇静治疗:一项针对护士的全国性调查。

Palliative sedation at home in the Netherlands: a nationwide survey among nurses.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2011 Aug;67(8):1719-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05614.x. Epub 2011 Mar 7.

Abstract

AIM

This paper is a report of a nationwide study conducted to assess experiences of nurses involved in palliative sedation at home after introduction of a physicians' guideline for palliative sedation.

BACKGROUND

Most studies investigating the practice of palliative sedation focus on physicians' practices and attitudes. However, little is known about experiences and attitudes of nurses.

METHODS

A web-based structured questionnaire was offered to 387 nurses providing medical technical care in 2007, assessing their experiences concerning decision-making, treatment policy and communication, focussing on the last patient receiving palliative sedation.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was filled out by 201 nurses (response rate 52%). The majority of respondents agreed with the indication for palliative sedation. However, 21% reported to have refused carrying out a palliative sedation in the preceding year. The general practitioner was not present at the start of palliative sedation in a third of the cases, but was available when needed. The sedation was considered insufficiently effective by 42% of the respondents. According to a third of the respondents, the level of sedation was not related to the required level of symptom relief nor were changes in dosage based on the severity of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Although the guideline for palliative sedation appears to be followed adequately in the majority of cases with respect to indication for palliative sedation and reportage. The survey findings revealed shortcomings in medication policy, communication, medical control over the start and continued monitoring of palliative sedation.

摘要

目的

本研究报告是一项全国性研究,旨在评估在引入姑息镇静医师指南后,护士在家中参与姑息镇静的经验。

背景

大多数调查姑息镇静实践的研究都集中在医生的实践和态度上。然而,对于护士的经验和态度知之甚少。

方法

2007 年,我们向 387 名提供医疗技术护理的护士提供了一份基于网络的结构化问卷,评估他们在决策、治疗政策和沟通方面的经验,重点是最后一位接受姑息镇静的患者。

结果

问卷由 201 名护士(应答率为 52%)填写。大多数受访者同意姑息镇静的指征。然而,21%的人报告在过去一年中拒绝进行姑息镇静。三分之一的情况下,开始姑息镇静时没有全科医生在场,但在需要时可以提供。42%的受访者认为镇静效果不够充分。三分之一的受访者认为镇静水平与所需症状缓解水平无关,也不会根据症状严重程度改变剂量。

结论

尽管姑息镇静指南在大多数情况下似乎都能很好地遵循,包括姑息镇静的指征和报告。调查结果显示,在药物治疗政策、沟通、对开始和持续监测姑息镇静的医疗控制方面存在不足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验