• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施电子健康记录在初级保健实践中的财务和非财务成本。

The financial and nonfinancial costs of implementing electronic health records in primary care practices.

机构信息

Institute for Health Care Research and Improvement, Baylor Health Care System, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Mar;30(3):481-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0768.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0768
PMID:21383367
Abstract

The incentives in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to expand the "meaningful use" of electronic health record systems have many health care professionals searching for information about the cost and staff resources that such systems require. We report the cost of implementing an electronic health record system in twenty-six primary care practices in a physician network in north Texas, taking into account hardware and software costs, as well as the time and effort invested in implementation. For an average five-physician practice, implementation cost an estimated $162,000, with $85,500 in maintenance expenses during the first year. We also estimate that the HealthTexas network implementation team and the practice implementation team needed 611 hours, on average, to prepare for and implement the electronic health record system, and that "end users"-physicians, other clinical staff, and nonclinical staff-needed 134 hours per physician, on average, to prepare for use of the record system in clinical encounters.

摘要

美国复苏与再投资法案中的激励措施旨在推动电子健康记录系统的“有效使用”,这促使许多医疗保健专业人员寻找有关这些系统所需成本和人员资源的信息。我们报告了在德克萨斯州北部的一个医师网络中的 26 个初级保健诊所实施电子健康记录系统的成本,其中考虑了硬件和软件成本,以及实施过程中投入的时间和精力。对于一个平均有 5 名医生的诊所,实施成本估计为 16.2 万美元,第一年的维护费用为 8.55 万美元。我们还估计,HealthTexas 网络实施团队和实践实施团队平均需要 611 个小时来准备和实施电子健康记录系统,而“最终用户”——医生、其他临床人员和非临床人员——平均每位医生需要 134 个小时来准备在临床接触中使用该记录系统。

相似文献

1
The financial and nonfinancial costs of implementing electronic health records in primary care practices.实施电子健康记录在初级保健实践中的财务和非财务成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Mar;30(3):481-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0768.
2
Impact of the HITECH financial incentives on EHR adoption in small, physician-owned practices.《健康信息技术经济与临床健康法案》(HITECH)财政激励措施对小型医生所有诊所采用电子健康记录(EHR)的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:143-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
3
EHRs in primary care practices: benefits, challenges, and successful strategies.基层医疗实践中的电子健康记录:效益、挑战和成功策略。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Feb 1;18(2):e48-54.
4
Electronic Health Record Use a Bitter Pill for Many Physicians.对许多医生来说,使用电子健康记录是件苦差事。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2016 Jan 1;13(Winter):1d. eCollection 2016.
5
Funding alternatives in EHR adoption: beyond HITECH incentives and traditional approaches.电子健康记录采用中的资金替代方案:超越《健康信息技术经济与临床健康法案》激励措施及传统方法。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2013 May;67(5):86-91.
6
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: lessons learned from physicians who have gone electronic.《美国复苏与再投资法案》:从已实现电子化的医生身上吸取的经验教训。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2010 Oct-Dec;29(4):332-8. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e3181fa04c8.
7
The regional extension center program: helping physicians meaningfully use health information technology.区域扩展中心计划:帮助医生有意义地使用医疗信息技术。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Nov 16;153(10):666-70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-10-201011160-00011.
8
Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2011.电子健康记录系统以及基层医疗医生诊所申请有意义使用激励措施的意向:美国,2001 - 2011年
NCHS Data Brief. 2011 Nov(79):1-8.
9
Avoiding the trap in the HITECH Act's incentive timeframe for implementing the EHR.避免陷入《健康信息技术经济和临床健康法案》(HITECH Act)中电子健康记录(EHR)实施激励期限的陷阱。
J Health Care Finance. 2010 Fall;37(1):91-100.
10
The value of electronic health records in solo or small group practices.电子健康记录在单人或小型医疗机构中的价值。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct;24(5):1127-37. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1127.

引用本文的文献

1
25 Years of Electronic Health Record Implementation Processes: Scoping Review.电子健康记录实施流程25年:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 3;27:e60077. doi: 10.2196/60077.
2
On the evaluation of synthetic longitudinal electronic health records.关于综合纵向电子健康记录的评估。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02304-4.
3
The information system stress, informatics competence and well-being of newly graduated and experienced nurses: a cross-sectional study.新毕业和有经验护士的信息系统压力、信息学能力与幸福感:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 15;21(1):1096. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07132-6.
4
Nurses' Attitudes Toward the Use of an Electronic Health Information System in a Developing Country.发展中国家护士对使用电子健康信息系统的态度。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2019 Apr 18;5:2377960819843711. doi: 10.1177/2377960819843711. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
5
Electronic medical record implementation in tertiary care: factors influencing adoption of an electronic medical record in a cancer centre.电子病历在三级护理中的实施:癌症中心采用电子病历的影响因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06015-6.
6
The Associations of Electronic Health Record Usability and User Age With Stress and Cognitive Failures Among Finnish Registered Nurses: Cross-Sectional Study.芬兰注册护士中电子健康记录可用性、用户年龄与压力及认知失误的关联:横断面研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Nov 18;8(11):e23623. doi: 10.2196/23623.
7
The impact of community-pharmacist-led medication reconciliation process: Pharmacist-patient-centered medication reconciliation.社区药师主导的药物重整流程的影响:以药师-患者为中心的药物重整
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020 Apr-Jun;12(2):177-182. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_55_20. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
8
Impact of health information technology optimization on clinical quality performance in health centers: A national cross-sectional study.优化健康信息技术对医疗中心临床质量表现的影响:一项全国性的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 15;15(7):e0236019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236019. eCollection 2020.
9
Late adopters of the electronic health record should move now.电子健康记录的晚期采用者现在应该行动起来了。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Mar;29(3):238-240. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010002. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
10
Primary Care Practices' Ability to Report Electronic Clinical Quality Measures in the EvidenceNOW Southwest Initiative to Improve Heart Health.初级保健实践在 EvidenceNOW 西南倡议中报告电子临床质量指标以改善心脏健康的能力。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198569. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8569.