Division of Orthodontics, Department of Orofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0438 , USA.
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Jun;34(3):263-75. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq144. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
The purpose of this study was to quantify the consistency and precision of locating three-dimensional (3D) anatomic landmarks. The hypotheses tested are that these landmarks have characteristic and variable error patterns associated with their type and location. The consistency and precision of nine orthodontists identifying 32 landmarks of 19 patients were quantified. The cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data were acquired using a Hitachi CB MercuRay system. Prior to the study, all examiners were calibrated with respect to the definitions of the landmarks and on the use of the software program (Dolphin) for identifying the landmarks. In addition, a reference guide was provided that had the definitions and sample images of the landmarks. Data were collected in spreadsheets as x, y, and z co-ordinates and statistically analysed to determine the mean and standard deviation (SD). The mean location for a given landmark on a given patient served as the reference point. The mean of the distances from the reference point was used as the consistency, while the SD of this mean was used as a measure of precision. The error in the x, y, and z planes was calculated in order to determine the specific characteristics of each landmark. The consistency in landmark location and precision did not differ significantly among the nine examiners. Sella turcica was the most consistently (0.50 mm) and most precisely (0.23 mm) identified anatomic landmark. The most inconsistent landmark was porion-right (2.72 mm) and the most imprecise landmark was orbitale-right (1.81 mm). Due to the lack of even distribution of the errors, careful use of these landmarks for analysis purposes is needed.
本研究的目的是量化三维(3D)解剖标志定位的一致性和精度。测试的假设是,这些标志具有与其类型和位置相关的特征性和可变误差模式。通过 19 名患者的 32 个标志来量化 9 名正畸医生的一致性和精度。锥形束 CT(CBCT)数据使用日立 CB MercuRay 系统获取。在研究之前,所有检查者都根据标志的定义以及用于识别标志的软件程序(Dolphin)进行了校准。此外,还提供了一份参考指南,其中包含标志的定义和示例图像。数据以 x、y 和 z 坐标的形式收集到电子表格中,并进行了统计分析,以确定平均值和标准偏差(SD)。给定患者的特定标志的平均位置用作参考点。参考点的平均距离用作一致性,而该平均值的 SD 用作精度的度量。计算了 x、y 和 z 平面中的误差,以确定每个标志的特定特征。9 名检查者的标志位置一致性和精度没有显着差异。蝶鞍是定位最一致(0.50mm)和最精确(0.23mm)的解剖标志。最不一致的标志是右侧顶骨(2.72mm),最不精确的标志是右侧眶下(1.81mm)。由于误差分布不均,在分析目的中需要谨慎使用这些标志。