Suppr超能文献

单次疗程后静态伸展和本体感受神经肌肉促进拉伸对腘绳肌长度的效果。

Efficacy of static stretching and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretch on hamstrings length after a single session.

机构信息

Human Movement and Function Laboratory, School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jun;25(6):1586-91. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181df7f98.

Abstract

A number of studies have investigated the efficacy of several repetitions of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching (PNF) and static stretching (SS). However, there is limited research comparing the effects of a single bout of these stretching maneuvers. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a single bout of a therapist-applied 30-second SS vs. a single bout of therapist-applied 6-second hamstring (agonist) contract PNF. Forty-five healthy subjects between the ages of 21 and 35 were randomly allocated to 1 of the 2 stretching groups or a control group, in which no stretching was received. The flexibility of the hamstring was determined by a range of passive knee extension, measured using a universal goniometer, with the subject in the supine position and the hip at 90° flexion, before and after intervention. A significant increase in knee extension was found for both intervention groups after a single stretch (SS group = 7.53°, p < 0.01 and PNF group = 11.80°, p < 0.01). Both interventions resulted in a significantly greater increase in knee extension when compared to the control group (p < 0.01). The PNF group demonstrated significantly greater gains in knee extension compared to the SS group (mean difference 4.27°, p < 0.01). It can be concluded that a therapist applied SS or PNF results in a significant increase in hamstring flexibility. A hamstring (agonist) contract PNF is more effective than an SS in a single stretching session. These findings are important to physiotherapists or trainers working in clinical and sporting environments. Where in the past therapists may have spent time conducting multiple repetitions of a PNF and an SS, a single bout of either technique may be considered just as effective. A key component of the study methodology was the exclusion of a warm-up period before stretching. Therefore, the findings of efficacy of a single PNF are of particular relevance in sporting environments and busy clinical settings where time may be limited.

摘要

许多研究已经调查了几种重复进行本体感受神经肌肉促进拉伸(PNF)和静态拉伸(SS)的功效。然而,比较这些拉伸技术单次效果的研究有限。本研究的目的是比较单次应用 30 秒 SS 与单次应用 6 秒腘绳肌(拮抗剂)收缩 PNF 的治疗师施加的拉伸动作的效果。45 名年龄在 21 至 35 岁之间的健康受试者被随机分配到 2 个拉伸组或对照组中的 1 个,对照组不接受拉伸。在干预前后,通过使用通用量角器测量仰卧位和髋关节屈曲 90°时的被动膝关节伸展范围来确定腘绳肌的柔韧性。在单次拉伸后,两组干预组的膝关节伸展度都显著增加(SS 组=7.53°,p<0.01 和 PNF 组=11.80°,p<0.01)。与对照组相比,两种干预措施都显著增加了膝关节伸展度(p<0.01)。与 SS 组相比,PNF 组的膝关节伸展度增加更为显著(平均差异 4.27°,p<0.01)。可以得出结论,治疗师施加的 SS 或 PNF 可显著增加腘绳肌柔韧性。在单次拉伸过程中,腘绳肌(拮抗剂)收缩 PNF 比 SS 更有效。这些发现对于在临床和运动环境中工作的物理治疗师或教练很重要。在过去,治疗师可能会花费时间进行多次 PNF 和 SS 的重复,现在单次使用任何一种技术都可能被认为同样有效。本研究方法的一个关键组成部分是在拉伸前不进行热身。因此,单次 PNF 有效性的发现对于时间有限的运动环境和繁忙的临床环境特别相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验