Tamura Kohei, Ihara Yasuo
Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyouku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Theor Popul Biol. 2011 Jun;79(4):174-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
Evolution of communication is conceptualized as a coevolutionary process in which evolution of signaler and that of receiver occur in an interdependent manner. Three classes of communication, mutualistic, altruistic, and exploiting, are distinguished depending on who gains a benefit or suffers a cost from successful communication. Communication is also dichotomized according to whether individuals are innately able to send and receive relevant signals or they have to acquire those signals culturally. We develop two-locus haploid models that represent the coevolutionary nature of the evolution of communication, and derive the conditions under which communicators can invade a population of non-communicators and those under which a population of communicators is evolutionarily stable against the invasion by non-communicators for each of the three classes of communication. Analysis of the models reveals that interaction among siblings enables the invasion of communication and that the optimal probability of interaction with siblings depends on the class of communication and the mode of signal transmission. In addition, cultural exploiting communication is more likely to invade a population of non-communicators than is genetic exploiting communication under certain circumstances.
通讯的进化被概念化为一个共同进化的过程,在这个过程中,信号发送者和接收者的进化以一种相互依存的方式发生。根据在成功通讯中谁受益或谁付出代价,通讯可分为三类:互利性通讯、利他性通讯和剥削性通讯。通讯还可根据个体是天生就能发送和接收相关信号,还是必须通过文化习得这些信号而分为两类。我们开发了双位点单倍体模型来表示通讯进化的共同进化本质,并推导了每种通讯类型下通讯者能够侵入非通讯者群体的条件,以及通讯者群体在进化上对非通讯者入侵保持稳定的条件。对模型的分析表明,兄弟姐妹之间的互动能够使通讯得以侵入,并且与兄弟姐妹互动的最佳概率取决于通讯类型和信号传递方式。此外,在某些情况下,文化剥削性通讯比基因剥削性通讯更有可能侵入非通讯者群体。