Why public policy on embryo research should not be based on religion.
作者信息
Strong Carson
机构信息
Department of Medicine, Health Science Center, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, 956 Court Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Mar;11(3):33-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.546476.
PMID:21400383
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Why public policy on embryo research should not be based on religion.
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Mar;11(3):33-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.546476.
2
Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere.
Hastings Womens Law J. 2003 Winter;14(1):89-108.
3
Promoting life?: Embryonic stem cell research legislation.
Cathol Univers Law Rev. 2003 Winter;52(2):437-79.
4
Practical parthenote policy and the practice of science.
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Mar;11(3):W1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.563162.
5
Stem-cell lines.
Wall St J (East Ed). 2005 May 26:A12.
6
Dipping into Uncle Sam's pockets: federal funding of stem cell research: is it legal?
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J. 2002 Spring;11(2-3):229-59.
7
Misapplied ethical considerations: U.S. federal stem cell mandates lack global focus and market foresight.
Cornell Int Law J. 2004;36(3):521-44.
8
Federal funding of human embryo stem cell research: advocating a broader approach.
Chic Kent Law Rev. 2003;78(1):423-43.
9
The intersection of law and medicine: the case for providing federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
Villanova Law Rev. 2004;49(2):329-61.
10
Sexless reproduction: a status symbol.
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Mar;11(3):1. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.576932.
引用本文的文献
1
Impedance of novel therapeutic technologies: the case of stem cells.
Clin Transl Sci. 2012 Oct;5(5):422-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00434.x. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
Zotero 插件