Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Heart Rhythm. 2011 Aug;8(8):1155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.03.016. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
The CHADS₂ score (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age >75 years, diabetes, and previous stroke/transient ischemic attack) is used for the risk stratification of strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
This study aimed to investigate the associations between the CHADS₂ score, atrial substrate, and outcome of catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF.
A total of 247 paroxysmal AF patients who received catheter ablation were enrolled. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to their CHADS₂ score (group 1: score 0, group 2: score 1 to 2, and group 3: score 3 to 6). The bi-atrial substrate properties and outcome of catheter ablation were analyzed.
The CHADS₂ scores in these 3 groups were 0 (group 1), 1.24 ± 0.48 (group 2), and 3.60 ± 0.83 (group 3), respectively. The left atrial voltage became lower (group 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 = 2.08 ± 0.73 mV vs. 1.80 ± 0.81 mV vs. 1.06 ± 0.69 mV) and the activation time longer (group 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 = 93.4 ± 17.7 ms vs. 101.9 ± 21.2 ms vs. 112.2 ± 21.7 ms), whereas the CHADS₂ score increased. During a follow-up of 17.3 ± 7.0 months, 23.1% of the study population suffered from recurrences. The recurrence rates of these 3 groups were 13.0% (group 1), 27.6% (group 2), and 45.9% (group 3), respectively. The groups of different CHADS₂ scores remained as the independent predictor of recurrence in the multivariate analysis.
A high CHADS₂ score was associated with different left atrial substrate properties and a poor outcome after catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF.
CHADS₂ 评分(充血性心力衰竭、高血压、年龄>75 岁、糖尿病和既往卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作)用于房颤(AF)患者中风的风险分层。
本研究旨在探讨 CHADS₂ 评分、心房基质与阵发性 AF 患者导管消融治疗结局之间的关系。
共纳入 247 例接受导管消融的阵发性 AF 患者。根据 CHADS₂ 评分(评分 0 分、评分 1-2 分、评分 3-6 分)将患者分为 3 组。分析双心房基质特性和导管消融治疗结局。
这 3 组的 CHADS₂ 评分分别为 0(组 1)、1.24±0.48(组 2)和 3.60±0.83(组 3)。左房电压降低(组 1 比组 2 比组 3=2.08±0.73 mV 比 1.80±0.81 mV 比 1.06±0.69 mV),激活时间延长(组 1 比组 2 比组 3=93.4±17.7 ms 比 101.9±21.2 ms 比 112.2±21.7 ms),而 CHADS₂ 评分增加。在 17.3±7.0 个月的随访期间,23.1%的研究人群出现复发。这 3 组的复发率分别为 13.0%(组 1)、27.6%(组 2)和 45.9%(组 3)。多因素分析显示,不同 CHADS₂ 评分组仍然是复发的独立预测因素。
高 CHADS₂ 评分与阵发性 AF 患者导管消融后不同的左心房基质特性和不良预后相关。