Rosenblum M G, Yung W K, Kelleher P J, Ruzicka F, Steck P A, Borden E C
Department of Clinical Immunology and Biological Therapy, University of Texas System Cancer Center, M.D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, Houston 77030.
J Interferon Res. 1990 Apr;10(2):141-51. doi: 10.1089/jir.1990.10.141.
The antiproliferative effects of human recombinant interferon-alpha (rIFN-alpha A) and interferon-beta (rIFN-beta ser) were assessed in vitro against seven human glioma cell lines. Further analysis of one of these lines (EFC-2) in response to rIFN-alpha A demonstrated a minimum growth inhibition by day 6 of treatment, whereas a 50% inhibition of cell growth was observed with a dose of 50 U/ml of IFN-beta ser. No significant growth inhibition was seen by rIFN-alpha A at doses up to 500 U/ml. Addition of rIFN-alpha A to rIFN-beta ser-treated EFC-2 cells neither suppressed nor augmented the antiproliferative response to IFN-beta ser. The binding of 125I-labeled rIFN-alpha A or 125I-labeled rIFN-beta ser to EFC-2 cells was inhibited competitively by increasing concentrations of either unlabeled rIFN-alpha A or rIFN-beta ser. This suggests that the cellular receptors for both rIFN-alpha A and rIFN-beta ser appear to be intact and appear to bind both agents equally. Furthermore, incubation of EFC-2 cells for 72 h with either rIFN-alpha A or rIFN-beta ser resulted in an increase in 2',5'-oligoadenylate (2-5A) synthetase activity 5-fold with rIFN-alpha A and 50-fold with rIFN-beta ser. Similarly, the 68-kD IFN-induced protein kinase was induced substantially with rIFN-beta ser but only slightly induced with rIFN-alpha A treatment. These results suggest that EFC-2 human glioma cells demonstrate a differential sensitivity in terms of growth inhibition to rIFN-beta ser and to rIFN-alpha A which appears to correlate with a differential induction of both intracellular 2-5A synthetase and protein kinase activity. These results cannot be explained solely on the basis of surface receptor binding of rIFN-alpha A and rIFN-beta ser. These data do suggest that, for human glioma cells in culture, type I IFN receptors may display a subtle architectural variation that allows equivalent binding of both IFN-alpha and IFN-beta ser, but allows an enhanced signal transduction and biological effect only after binding a specific IFN subtype.
在体外评估了重组人α干扰素(rIFN-αA)和β干扰素(rIFN-βser)对7种人胶质瘤细胞系的抗增殖作用。对其中一种细胞系(EFC-2)针对rIFN-αA的进一步分析表明,在治疗第6天时生长抑制最小,而当IFN-βser剂量为50 U/ml时观察到细胞生长受到50%的抑制。rIFN-αA在高达500 U/ml的剂量下未观察到明显的生长抑制。将rIFN-αA添加到经rIFN-βser处理的EFC-2细胞中,既未抑制也未增强对IFN-βser的抗增殖反应。125I标记的rIFN-αA或125I标记的rIFN-βser与EFC-2细胞的结合受到未标记的rIFN-αA或rIFN-βser浓度增加的竞争性抑制。这表明rIFN-αA和rIFN-βser的细胞受体似乎完整,并且似乎能同等地结合这两种药物。此外,用rIFN-αA或rIFN-βser将EFC-2细胞孵育72小时导致2',5'-寡腺苷酸(2-5A)合成酶活性增加,rIFN-αA使其增加5倍,rIFN-βser使其增加50倍。同样,68-kD的IFN诱导蛋白激酶在rIFN-βser处理后大量诱导,但在rIFN-αA处理后仅轻微诱导。这些结果表明,EFC-2人胶质瘤细胞在生长抑制方面对rIFN-βser和rIFN-αA表现出不同的敏感性,这似乎与细胞内2-5A合成酶和蛋白激酶活性的不同诱导相关。这些结果不能仅基于rIFN-αA和rIFN-βser的表面受体结合来解释。这些数据确实表明,对于培养的人胶质瘤细胞,I型干扰素受体可能表现出细微的结构差异,这种差异允许IFN-α和IFN-βser同等结合,但仅在结合特定的干扰素亚型后才允许增强的信号转导和生物学效应。