Suppr超能文献

NHS 委托改革:出钱的人能否真正掌控局面?

Commissioning reform in the NHS: will he who pays the piper ever really call the tune?

机构信息

NHS Confederation, London.

出版信息

Clin Med (Lond). 2011 Feb;11(1):35-9. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-1-35.

Abstract

Since the purchaser/provider split was first introduced in the early 1990s, there have been successive attempts to enhance and strengthen the role of commissioners in the English NHS. Their role is to ensure that health services are planned and delivered in a way that meets the interests of patients and taxpayers rather than healthcare providers. The new coalition government has recently set out its proposals to transfer commissioning responsibilities from primary care trusts to a national NHS Commissioning Board and a set of general practice-led commissioning consortia. It is too early to say whether these reforms are likely to transform commissioning and finally place payers, rather than providers, in the driving seat of the NHS. However they unfold they are likely to have a significant impact on healthcare professionals in commissioning, primary care and specialist roles.

摘要

自 20 世纪 90 年代初首次引入购买方/提供方分离制度以来,英国国民保健署(NHS)一直在不断尝试加强和增强专员的作用。他们的角色是确保卫生服务的规划和提供符合患者和纳税人的利益,而不是医疗保健提供者的利益。新一届联合政府最近提出了将委托责任从基层医疗信托转移到国家 NHS 委托委员会和一系列以一般实践为导向的委托联盟的建议。现在说这些改革是否有可能改变委托制,最终使支付方而不是提供方成为 NHS 的主导力量还为时过早。然而,无论它们如何发展,它们都可能对委托、初级保健和专业角色中的医疗保健专业人员产生重大影响。

相似文献

4
Trusts have been set "impossible task" to balance books, say NHS leaders.
BMJ. 2016 Mar 9;352:i1444. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1444.
6
Extra-market incentives in the new NHS.新国民医疗服务体系中的市场外激励措施。
Health Policy. 1993 Sep;25(1-2):169-83. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(93)90110-b.
9

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验