Piorkowski James R, DeRosier Leo C, Nickerson Paul, Fix R Jobe
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2011 May;66(5):534-6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31820b3ccc.
Superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap breast reconstruction has advantages over deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous flap (TRAM) reconstructions with less donor site morbidity and less complicated flap dissection. Not all patients have an adequate SIEA and superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) to support free tissue breast reconstruction, and dissection of the SIEA in all patients can be time consuming. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) angiograms can be used to identify the SIEA and SIEV in patients planning to undergo free abdominal tissue breast reconstruction and direct more efficient dissection in patients with a large SIEA. Retrospective analysis of free abdominal tissue flap breast reconstruction from a single plastic surgeon was performed. All patients undergoing free abdominal tissue breast reconstruction had a preoperative CT angiogram using a protocol for the evaluation of the abdominal wall perforating arteries. CT scans were reviewed by the surgeon preoperatively and evaluated for the presence, caliber, and image quality of the SIEA and SIEV. All patients, regardless of CT angiogram findings, had operative dissection and evaluation of the SIEA and SIEV. A total of 177 free flaps were performed on 113 patients who underwent preoperative CT angiogram and free abdominal tissue breast reconstruction. Of them, 64 patients had bilateral breast reconstruction. Twelve SIEA flaps (10.6%) were performed on 12 patients. During preoperative CT angiographic evaluation, 49 patients (43%) were noted to have at least one visible SIEA, whereas only 24 of those patients (21%) were felt to have an SIEA of adequate caliber. No flaps were lost during the postoperative period. All 12 SIEA flaps performed had an adequate SIEA when observed on preoperative CT angiogram. Overall, 50% of patients found to have at least one adequate SIEA on CT angiogram had a single breast reconstructed with an SIEA flap. If the SIEA was not visualized on CT angiogram, no usable SIEA was found during surgery. Preoperative CT angiogram of the abdominal wall perforating arteries can help predict which patients may have adequate anatomy for an SIEA-based free flap. This information may help direct more efficient dissection of the abdominal flaps by selecting out patients who do not have an adequate SIEA.
腹壁浅动脉(SIEA)皮瓣乳房重建术相较于腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP)和保留肌肉的腹直肌肌皮瓣(TRAM)重建术具有优势,其供区并发症更少,皮瓣解剖也更简单。并非所有患者都有足够的腹壁浅动脉和腹壁浅静脉(SIEV)来支持游离组织乳房重建,而且对所有患者进行腹壁浅动脉解剖可能会很耗时。术前计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影可用于识别计划接受游离腹部组织乳房重建的患者的腹壁浅动脉和腹壁浅静脉,并指导对腹壁浅动脉粗大的患者进行更有效的解剖。对一位整形外科医生进行的游离腹部组织皮瓣乳房重建进行了回顾性分析。所有接受游离腹部组织乳房重建的患者均进行了术前CT血管造影,采用评估腹壁穿支动脉的方案。外科医生在术前查看CT扫描结果,并评估腹壁浅动脉和腹壁浅静脉的存在情况、管径及图像质量。所有患者,无论CT血管造影结果如何,均进行了腹壁浅动脉和腹壁浅静脉的手术解剖和评估。对113例行术前CT血管造影及游离腹部组织乳房重建的患者共实施了177例游离皮瓣手术。其中,64例患者进行了双侧乳房重建。12例患者实施了12例腹壁浅动脉皮瓣手术(10.6%)。在术前CT血管造影评估中,49例患者(43%)被发现至少有一条可见的腹壁浅动脉,而其中只有24例患者(21%)被认为腹壁浅动脉管径足够。术后期间无皮瓣丢失。术前CT血管造影显示,所有实施的12例腹壁浅动脉皮瓣均有足够的腹壁浅动脉。总体而言,CT血管造影显示至少有一条足够的腹壁浅动脉的患者中,50%的患者用腹壁浅动脉皮瓣进行了单侧乳房重建。如果CT血管造影未显示腹壁浅动脉,则手术中未发现可用的腹壁浅动脉。腹壁穿支动脉的术前CT血管造影有助于预测哪些患者可能具有适合基于腹壁浅动脉的游离皮瓣的解剖结构。该信息可能有助于通过筛选出腹壁浅动脉不足的患者来指导更有效地解剖腹部皮瓣。