Suppr超能文献

[用于预测1年长期护理保险认证风险的基洪检查表的验证:大崎队列2006研究]

[Validation of the Kihon Checklist for predicting the risk of 1-year incident long-term care insurance certification: the Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study].

作者信息

Tomata Yasutake, Hozawa Atsushi, Ohmori-Matsuda Kaori, Nagai Masato, Sugawara Yumi, Nitta Akemi, Kuriyama Shinichi, Tsuji Ichiro

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Forensic Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2011 Jan;58(1):3-13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The "Kihon Checklist" (a frailty checklist), consisting of 25 items, is used for screening frail elderly, based on the Japanese long-term care insurance system. However, few reports have investigated predictive ability of incident long-term care insurance certification in the Kihon Checklist. The purpose of this study was to investigate inter-relationships and accuracy as a screening test of individual items and criteria in the Kihon Checklist for incident long-term care insurance certification.

METHODS

In December 2006, we distributed a questionnaire including the Kihon Checklist to individuals older than 65 years living in Ohsaki City, Japan. Among the valid respondents, we followed those who gave informed consent to follow-up, had more than 1 item of response on the Kihon Checklist, and were not qualified for long-term care insurance certification at the baseline. We further excluded individuals who died or moved away in the one year follow-up, analyzing 14,636 elderly. The age- and sex-adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for newly incident long-term care insurance certification were estimated by logistic regression analysis. Independent variables were each of the items and criteria in the Kihon Checklist used for screening of "frail elderly". In addition, we estimated the sensitivity and specificity, and conducted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for each criteria domain.

RESULTS

5,560 (38.0%) matched the criteria of "frail elderly". During the one year of follow-up, 483 (3.3%) required newly incident long-term care insurance certification. All of the items in the Kihon Checklist were significantly associated with incident long-term care insurance certification (range of ORs: 1.45-4.67). In addition, all of the criteria also significantly predicted the risk of incident long-term care insurance certification (range of OR: 1.93-6.54). The OR (95%CI) for "frail elderly" was 3.80 (3.02-4.78). Among the various domains, "20 items other than five related to prevention and support for depression" had the largest area under the ROC curve.

CONCLUSION

All items and criteria used for screening frail elderly in the Kihon Checklist are useful for predicting the risk of incident long-term care insurance certification during a one-year period. However, the strength of the relation and accuracy for screening test were variable among items or domains, and criteria values could be improved.

摘要

目的

基于日本长期护理保险制度,由25项内容组成的“基础检查表”(一种衰弱检查表)用于筛查衰弱老年人。然而,很少有报告调查基础检查表对长期护理保险认证事件的预测能力。本研究的目的是调查基础检查表中各项内容和标准之间的相互关系以及作为长期护理保险认证事件筛查测试的准确性。

方法

2006年12月,我们向居住在日本大崎市的65岁以上老年人发放了包含基础检查表的问卷。在有效受访者中,我们跟踪那些同意随访、在基础检查表上有多项回答且在基线时不符合长期护理保险认证资格的人。我们进一步排除了在一年随访中死亡或搬走的个体,分析了14636名老年人。通过逻辑回归分析估计新发生的长期护理保险认证的年龄和性别调整优势比(OR)及95%置信区间(95%CI)。自变量是基础检查表中用于筛查 “衰弱老年人” 的各项内容和标准。此外,我们估计了敏感性和特异性,并对每个标准领域进行了受试者工作特征(ROC)分析。

结果

5560人(38.0%)符合 “衰弱老年人” 的标准。在一年的随访期间,483人(3.3%)需要新的长期护理保险认证。基础检查表中的所有项目均与长期护理保险认证事件显著相关(OR范围:1.45 - 4.67)。此外,所有标准也显著预测了长期护理保险认证事件的风险(OR范围:1.93 - 6.54)。“衰弱老年人” 的OR(95%CI)为3.80(3.02 - 4.78)。在各个领域中,“除与抑郁症预防和支持相关的五项之外的20项” 的ROC曲线下面积最大。

结论

基础检查表中用于筛查衰弱老年人的所有项目和标准对于预测一年内新发生的长期护理保险认证风险都是有用的。然而,各项目或领域之间关系的强度和筛查测试的准确性存在差异,标准值可以改进。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验