Suppr超能文献

成瘾治疗项目中实施循证实践的障碍:比较员工关于动机性访谈、青少年社区强化法、积极社区治疗和认知行为疗法的报告。

Barriers to implementing evidence-based practices in addiction treatment programs: comparing staff reports on Motivational Interviewing, Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach, Assertive Community Treatment, and Cognitive-behavioral Therapy.

作者信息

Amodeo M, Lundgren L, Cohen A, Rose D, Chassler D, Beltrame C, D'Ippolito M

机构信息

Center for Addictions Research and Services, Boston University, School of Social Work, 264 Bay State Road, Boston, MA 02215, United States.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2011 Nov;34(4):382-9. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This qualitative study explored barriers to implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs) in community-based addiction treatment organizations (CBOs) by comparing staff descriptions of barriers for four EBPs: Motivational Interviewing (MI), Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA), Assertive Community Treatment (ACT), and Cognitive-behavioral Therapy (CBT).

METHODS

The CBOs received CSAT/SAMHSA funding from 2003 to 2008 to deliver services using EBPs. Phone interview responses from 172 CBO staff directly involved in EBP implementation were analyzed using content analysis, a method for making inferences and developing themes from the systematic review of participant narratives (Berelson, 1952).

RESULTS

Staff described different types of barriers to implementing each EBP. For MI, the majority of barriers involved staff resistance or organizational setting. For A-CRA, the majority of barriers involved specific characteristics of the EBP or client resistance. For CBT, the majority of barriers were associated with client resistance, and for ACT, the majority of barriers were associated with resources.

DISCUSSION

EBP designers, policy makers who support EBP dissemination and funders should include explicit strategies to address such barriers. Addiction programs proposing to use specific EBPs must consider whether their programs have the organizational capacity and community capacity to meet the demands of the EBP selected.

摘要

目的

本定性研究通过比较工作人员对四种循证实践(EBP)——动机性访谈(MI)、青少年社区强化法(A-CRA)、积极社区治疗(ACT)和认知行为疗法(CBT)——障碍的描述,探索社区成瘾治疗组织(CBO)实施循证实践的障碍。

方法

这些社区成瘾治疗组织在2003年至2008年期间获得了药物滥用和精神健康服务管理局(CSAT/SAMHSA)的资金,用于采用循证实践提供服务。对172名直接参与循证实践实施的社区成瘾治疗组织工作人员的电话访谈回复进行了内容分析,这是一种从对参与者叙述的系统回顾中进行推断和形成主题的方法(贝雷尔森,1952年)。

结果

工作人员描述了实施每种循证实践的不同类型障碍。对于动机性访谈,大多数障碍涉及工作人员的抵触或组织环境。对于青少年社区强化法,大多数障碍涉及循证实践的特定特征或服务对象的抵触。对于认知行为疗法,大多数障碍与服务对象的抵触有关,而对于积极社区治疗,大多数障碍与资源有关。

讨论

循证实践的设计者、支持循证实践推广的政策制定者和资助者应纳入明确的策略来应对此类障碍。提议采用特定循证实践的成瘾项目必须考虑其项目是否具备组织能力和社区能力来满足所选循证实践的要求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验