Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
J Chin Med Assoc. 2011 Mar;74(3):125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2011.01.027. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
Test evaluation in a clinical curriculum is important for medical education. To identify examinee ability and appropriateness of the test content, this study used the Rasch model to analyze an examination in anesthesiology for medical students.
Fifty items were administered to 119 fifth- and sixth-year medical students in the exam. The Rasch model was used to perform item analysis of the examination. Misfit items or examinees were excluded first, then test reliability was assessed with reliability indices. Both examinee ability measures and item difficulty were estimated and expressed in a common logit unit, which could be further translated into probability of correct responses in the examination.
After the exclusion of two misfit items and one misfit examinee, the estimated test reliability was only 0.63. The mean item difficulty was set at 0 by definition (SD = 2.02) and the mean examinee ability was 1.56 (SD = 0.71), which means that the examinees were able to correctly answer 83% of items on average. There were 21 items with difficulty lower than the least able examinee and two items with difficulty higher than the most able one.
We demonstrated that statistical item analysis with the Rasch model could provide valuable information related to test reliability, item difficulty and examinee ability, which could be applied to further item modification and future test development of clinical curriculums for medical students.
临床课程中的测试评估对于医学教育至关重要。为了确定考生的能力和测试内容的适当性,本研究使用 RASCH 模型分析了医学生麻醉学考试。
对 119 名五六年级医学生进行了 50 项考试。使用 RASCH 模型对考试进行项目分析。首先排除不拟合项目和考生,然后使用可靠性指数评估测试可靠性。同时估计考生能力和项目难度,并以共同对数单位表示,可进一步转换为考试中正确回答的概率。
排除两个不拟合项目和一个不拟合考生后,估计的测试可靠性仅为 0.63。定义平均项目难度为 0(标准差为 2.02),平均考生能力为 1.56(标准差为 0.71),这意味着考生平均能够正确回答 83%的项目。有 21 个项目难度低于最不熟练的考生,有两个项目难度高于最熟练的考生。
我们证明了使用 RASCH 模型进行统计项目分析可以提供与测试可靠性、项目难度和考生能力相关的有价值信息,这些信息可用于进一步修改项目和开发医学生临床课程的未来测试。