Suppr超能文献

在怀疑心肌缺血的患者中,使用布鲁斯跑步机方案高估有氧能力。

Overestimation of aerobic capacity with the bruce treadmill protocol in patients being assessed for suspected myocardial ischemia.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Medical College of Virginia Campus, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):254-60. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318211e3ed.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Peak oxygen uptake (VO₂) is prognostic for morbidity and mortality. Estimating aerobic capacity during traditional exercise stress testing is common as it has been shown that total treadmill time on the Bruce protocol predicts peak VO₂. However, the potential to overestimate peak VO2 exists and may have clinical implications regarding the interpretation of exercise test data.

METHODS

Subjects (N = 303) with symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia underwent a myocardial perfusion study and an exercise test with simultaneous ventilatory expired gas analysis. Estimated peak VO₂ from the Bruce treadmill protocol was compared with measured peak VO₂. The Duke Treadmill Score (DTS) was calculated with treadmill time (DTS(time)) and also with measured VO₂ (DTS(measured)),expressed as metabolic equivalents (METs), and converted to time.

RESULTS

Peak measured METs was significantly lower than peak estimated METs in the entire cohort (6.5 ± 1.9 vs 8.8 ± 2.8, P < .001) as well as in female (5.7 ± 1.4 and 7.8 ± 2.1, P < .001) and male (7.3 ± 2.0 and 9.7 ± 3.1, P < .001) subgroups. Calculation of the DTS with measured METs resulted in a significantly lower score compared with its calculation with treadmill time (2.7 ± 3.5 vs 5.8 ± 4.6, P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that DTS(measured) produce a statistically significant model for diagnosing a perfusion defect in both men and women (P < .05), whereas DTS(time) was diagnostic only in men (P < .05).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that estimates of aerobic capacity are significantly higher than measured values and this difference may result in a significant underestimation of morbidity/mortality risk.

摘要

简介

最大摄氧量(VO₂)是发病率和死亡率的预后指标。在传统运动压力测试中估算有氧能力很常见,因为已经证明布鲁斯方案的总跑步机时间可以预测峰值 VO₂。然而,存在高估峰值 VO₂的可能性,并且可能对运动测试数据的解释具有临床意义。

方法

有心肌缺血症状的受试者(N = 303)接受心肌灌注研究和运动测试,同时进行通气呼出气体分析。比较布鲁斯跑步机方案估计的峰值 VO₂与测量的峰值 VO₂。计算 Duke 跑步机评分(DTS),使用跑步机时间(DTS(time))和测量的 VO₂(DTS(measured)),表示为代谢当量(MET),并转换为时间。

结果

整个队列的峰值测量 MET 明显低于峰值估计 MET(6.5 ± 1.9 与 8.8 ± 2.8,P <.001),女性(5.7 ± 1.4 和 7.8 ± 2.1,P <.001)和男性(7.3 ± 2.0 和 9.7 ± 3.1,P <.001)亚组也是如此。用测量的 MET 计算 DTS 会导致评分明显低于用跑步机时间计算的评分(2.7 ± 3.5 与 5.8 ± 4.6,P <.001)。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,DTS(measured) 在男性和女性中均能为诊断灌注缺陷提供统计学上显著的模型(P <.05),而 DTS(time)仅在男性中具有诊断能力(P <.05)。

讨论

本研究表明,有氧能力的估计值明显高于测量值,这种差异可能导致发病率/死亡率风险的严重低估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验