Suppr超能文献

[意大利重症心脏监护病房的住院分布与合理性、资源利用情况。BLITZ - 3研究]

[Distribution and appropriateness of hospital admissions, resource utilization in the Italian intensive cardiac care units. The BLITZ-3 study].

作者信息

Visconti Luigi Oltrona, Scorcu Giampaolo, Cassin Matteo, Casella Gianni, Chinaglia Alessandra, Conte Maria Rosa, Fradella Giuseppe, Lucci Donata, Maggioni Aldo Pietro, Pirelli Salvatore, Chiarella Francesco

机构信息

Divisione di Cardiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia.

出版信息

G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2011 Jan;12(1):23-30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The BLITZ-3 study prospectively evaluated the epidemiology of hospital admissions, the patterns of care and the most important comorbidities in intensive cardiac care unit (ICCU) patients.

METHODS

Distribution and level of appropriateness of hospital admissions in relation to type of ICCU were analyzed (type A, 32%, without cardiac cath lab or cardiac surgery; type B, 49%, with cath lab; type C, 19%, with both cath lab and cardiac surgery). The caseload was estimated on the basis of different levels of mortality risk during the ICCU stay: high (>5.1%), intermediate (0.7-5.1%), low (< or = 0.7%).

RESULTS

A total of 6986 consecutive patients admitted to 332 ICCUs were enrolled. A median number of 19 patients (interquartile range 15-26) was admitted to each center during the 14 days of enrollment; 28% of the ICCUs admitted more than 25 patients, 48% between 15 and 25, and 24% less than 15. A higher number of type A ICCUs admitted less than 15 patients (p<0.0001), whereas a higher number of type C ICCUs admitted more than 25 patients (p<0.0001). Hospital admissions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction occurred more frequently in type B or C ICCUs (p<0.0001), whereas hospital admission for heart failure mostly occurred in type A ICCUs (p<0.0001). The number of patients not undergoing reperfusion (p<0.0001) or treated with thrombolytic therapy (p<0.0001) was higher in the type A ICCUs. Coronary revascularization with primary percutaneous coronary intervention was performed more frequently in type B and C ICCUs (p<0.0001). Similarly, patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome underwent coronary angiography (p<0.0001) and percutaneous coronary intervention more frequently in type B and C ICCUs (p<0.0001). Prevalence of low-risk rather than intermediate- or high-risk patients was higher in type A ICCUs (p<0.05), and prevalence of high- or intermediate-risk patients was higher in type C ICCUs (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the BLITZ-3 study should lead the Italian cardiological community to reflect upon the needed number of ICCUs, the role of Spoke centers for their integration in the interhospital network, and inappropriate hospital admissions for low-risk conditions.

摘要

背景

BLITZ - 3研究前瞻性评估了重症心脏监护病房(ICCU)患者的住院流行病学、护理模式及最重要的合并症。

方法

分析了与ICCU类型相关的住院分布及适宜性水平(A类,32%,无心脏导管实验室或心脏手术;B类,49%,有导管实验室;C类,19%,既有导管实验室又有心脏手术)。根据ICCU住院期间不同的死亡风险水平估计病例数:高(>5.1%)、中(0.7 - 5.1%)、低(≤0.7%)。

结果

共纳入332个ICCU连续收治的6986例患者。在入组的14天内,每个中心的入院患者中位数为19例(四分位间距15 - 26);28%的ICCU收治超过25例患者,48%收治15至25例,24%收治少于15例。A类ICCU收治少于15例患者的数量更多(p<0.0001),而C类ICCU收治超过25例患者的数量更多(p<0.0001)。ST段抬高型心肌梗死的住院患者在B类或C类ICCU中更常见(p<0.0001),而心力衰竭的住院患者大多在A类ICCU中(p<0.0001)。A类ICCU中未进行再灌注治疗(p<0.0001)或接受溶栓治疗(p<0.0001)的患者数量更多。B类和C类ICCU更频繁地进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠状动脉血运重建(p<0.0001)。同样,因急性冠状动脉综合征住院的患者在B类和C类ICCU中更频繁地接受冠状动脉造影(p<0.0001)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(p<0.0001)。A类ICCU中低风险而非中风险或高风险患者的患病率更高(p<0.05),C类ICCU中高风险或中风险患者的患病率更高(p<0.05)。

结论

BLITZ - 3研究结果应促使意大利心脏病学界反思ICCU的所需数量、辐条中心在医院间网络整合中的作用以及低风险情况的不适当住院。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验