Lindqvist Aron, Berglund Maria, von Kieseritzky Johanna, Nilsson Olle
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2010 Nov;44(4-5):237-44. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2010.516590.
Our aim was to rate the severity of injuries to hands by powered wood splitters. The patients were identified from a computerised registry, and the cause of injury was confirmed by written questionnaire and structured telephone interview. Information about the anatomy of the injury was gathered from patients' records and radiographs. Severity of injury was rated according to the Hand Injury Severity Scoring System (HISS system) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS). The reliability of HISS rating was tested. The mean Hand Injury Severity Score (HISS) was 63 and the mean ISS was 3.7. Twenty-five (19%) of patients had minor, 41 (31%) had moderate, 30 (23%) had severe, and 35 (27 %) had major injuries when scored by the HISS system. Children's injuries were more severe than those of adults. There was no difference in severity between injuries made by wedge and screw splitters. It is not possible to avoid serious hand injuries from powered wood splitters completely by prohibiting one of the two main types of splitter.
我们的目的是评估动力劈木机造成的手部损伤的严重程度。通过计算机登记系统识别患者,并通过书面问卷和结构化电话访谈确认受伤原因。从患者记录和X光片中收集有关损伤部位的信息。根据手部损伤严重程度评分系统(HISS系统)和损伤严重程度评分(ISS)对损伤严重程度进行评级。测试了HISS评分的可靠性。手部损伤严重程度评分(HISS)的平均值为63,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)的平均值为3.7。根据HISS系统评分,25名(19%)患者为轻伤,41名(31%)为中度伤,30名(23%)为重伤,35名(27%)为严重伤。儿童的损伤比成人更严重。楔式劈木机和螺旋式劈木机造成的损伤在严重程度上没有差异。通过禁止两种主要类型的劈木机之一,不可能完全避免动力劈木机造成的严重手部损伤。