• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人结直肠癌风险及筛查的可能方法。

Risk for colorectal cancer in elderly persons and possible methodologies for their screening.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Israel.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 May;23(5):431-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328345bc38.

DOI:10.1097/MEG.0b013e328345bc38
PMID:21448071
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Most colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines recommend average-risk screening up to the age of 75 years. However, increasing life span and incidence of proximal CRC could require changes to the age guidelines and adapting screening methodology for the elderly persons. Therefore, we reviewed our CRC epidemiology, international screening age-guidelines, and screening tests for the elderly persons and presented our long-term results of colonoscopy and semi-quantitated immunochemical fecal occult blood tests (I-FOBTs) in individuals that are 75 years or more.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined the Israel National Cancer Registry (INCR) data to assess the risk of CRC in individuals aged 75 years or more. We re-examined files of patients aged 75 years or more, who underwent both colonoscopy and three I-FOBTs, and followed them through the INCR to identify new cases of CRC.

RESULTS

Nationwide, during 2005 and 2007, 41.3% of all CRCs occurred in individuals aged 75 years or more. Both I-FOBT and colonoscopy were performed on 271 individuals (mean age: 78.5 years, standard deviation: 3.1). Both initial colonoscopy and I-FOBT of at least 50 ngHb/ml buffer in either of the first two tests identified six patients with CRC; INCR registered another stage 1 rectal CRC within 1 year. Therefore, the initial sensitivity to CRC of either test was 85.7% (95% confidence interval: 59.8 and 112), valid during a mean of 44.3 months and a standard deviation of 13.4 at INCR follow-up; 14 of 27 advanced adenomatous polyps were identified by I-FOBT, giving a sensitivity of 58.8% (95% confidence interval: 42.3 and 75.4) for CRC or advanced adenomatous polyps.

CONCLUSION

Recently, 41.3% of our CRCs occurred in individuals aged 75 years or more, diagnosed clinically and not by screening. I-FOBT and initial colonoscopic CRC sensitivity were similar, both having false-negative results. Screening age guidelines need reconsideration; our initial results show that semi-quantitated I-FOBT screening is feasible but needs large-scale evaluation in 'healthy' elderly persons.

摘要

目的

大多数结直肠癌(CRC)筛查指南建议对平均风险人群进行筛查,直至 75 岁。然而,随着预期寿命的延长和近端 CRC 的发病率增加,可能需要修改年龄指南,并为老年人调整筛查方法。因此,我们回顾了 CRC 的流行病学、国际筛查年龄指南以及老年人的筛查试验,并介绍了我们对 75 岁及以上人群进行结肠镜检查和半定量免疫化学粪便潜血试验(I-FOBT)的长期结果。

材料和方法

我们检查了以色列国家癌症登记处(INCR)的数据,以评估 75 岁及以上人群患 CRC 的风险。我们重新检查了年龄在 75 岁及以上、接受过结肠镜检查和三次 I-FOBT 的患者的档案,并通过 INCR 对其进行随访,以确定新的 CRC 病例。

结果

在全国范围内,2005 年和 2007 年,所有 CRC 中有 41.3%发生在 75 岁及以上人群中。271 名患者同时进行了 I-FOBT 和结肠镜检查(平均年龄:78.5 岁,标准差:3.1)。初次结肠镜检查和前两次检测中至少有一次缓冲液 50ngHb/ml 的 I-FOBT 共发现 6 例 CRC;INCR 在 1 年内又登记了 1 例 1 期直肠 CRC。因此,两种检测方法对 CRC 的初始敏感性均为 85.7%(95%置信区间:59.8%至 112%),在 INCR 随访的平均 44.3 个月和标准差 13.4 内有效;14 个高级腺瘤性息肉通过 I-FOBT 检出,CRC 或高级腺瘤性息肉的敏感性为 58.8%(95%置信区间:42.3%至 75.4%)。

结论

最近,我们有 41.3%的 CRC 发生在 75 岁及以上的人群中,这些患者是通过临床诊断而不是筛查发现的。I-FOBT 和初次结肠镜检查对 CRC 的敏感性相似,均存在假阴性结果。筛查年龄指南需要重新考虑;我们的初步结果表明,半定量 I-FOBT 筛查是可行的,但需要在“健康”老年人中进行大规模评估。

相似文献

1
Risk for colorectal cancer in elderly persons and possible methodologies for their screening.老年人结直肠癌风险及筛查的可能方法。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 May;23(5):431-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328345bc38.
2
The changing epidemiology of colorectal cancer and its relevance for adapting screening guidelines and methods.结直肠癌的流行病学变化及其对调整筛查指南和方法的意义。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2011 Jan;20(1):46-53. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328341e309.
3
Colorectal carcinoma: is screening possible?结直肠癌:筛查可行吗?
Tech Coloproctol. 2004 Dec;8 Suppl 2:s267-72. doi: 10.1007/s10151-004-0174-1.
4
Evidence for colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查的证据。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;24(4):417-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005.
5
Colorectal cancer test use--Maryland, 2002-2006.2002 - 2006年马里兰州的结直肠癌检测使用情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007 Sep 14;56(36):932-6.
6
Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics.使用新型粪便潜血试验筛查结直肠肿瘤:性能特征的最新进展。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Oct 3;99(19):1462-70. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm150. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
7
A population-based estimate of the extent of colorectal cancer screening in Ontario.安大略省基于人群的结直肠癌筛查范围估计。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1141-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30623.x.
8
Colorectal cancer: risk factors and recommendations for early detection.结直肠癌:风险因素及早期检测建议
Am Fam Physician. 1999 Jun;59(11):3083-92.
9
Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication.结肠镜检查:按适应证对其癌症和腺瘤检出率的综述。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Mar;90(3):353-65.
10
Screening of colorectal cancer.结直肠癌筛查
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2005 Oct;14(4):699-722. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2005.05.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing epidemiology of colorectal cancer makes screening sigmoidoscopy less useful for identifying carriers of colorectal neoplasms.结直肠癌流行病学的改变使得乙状结肠镜筛查对于识别结直肠肿瘤携带者的作用降低。
Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Aug;57(8):2203-12. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2146-z. Epub 2012 Apr 1.