National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 May 4;93(9):e50. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00262. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
This commentary was updated on April 15, 2011, because of a previous error. In the third paragraph, the sentence that had previously read “In the SPRINT, the two groups of open fractures were associated with statistically equivalent reoperation rates, but there was a trend toward better healing in the open fracture group treated with reamed intramedullary nailing.” now reads “In the SPRINT, the two groups of open fractures were associated with statistically equivalent reoperation rates, but there was a trend toward better healing in the open fracture group treated with unreamed intramedullary nailing.”
本评论于 2011 年 4 月 15 日更新,原因是之前的一个错误。在第三段中,之前的句子是“在 SPRINT 中,两组开放性骨折的再次手术率具有统计学等效性,但在接受扩髓髓内钉治疗的开放性骨折组中,愈合趋势更好。”,现在改为“在 SPRINT 中,两组开放性骨折的再次手术率具有统计学等效性,但在接受非扩髓髓内钉治疗的开放性骨折组中,愈合趋势更好。”