Suppr超能文献

多西他赛联合卡培他滨或吉西他滨联合顺铂或吉西他滨联合卡铂作为蒽环类药物失败后的转移性乳腺癌一线治疗:一项 II 期随机选择试验。

Biweekly gemcitabine-paclitaxel, gemcitabine-carboplatin, or gemcitabine-cisplatin as first-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer after anthracycline failure: a phase II randomized selection trial.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.

出版信息

Breast Cancer. 2011 Jul;18(3):203-12. doi: 10.1007/s12282-011-0260-y. Epub 2011 Apr 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel, phase II selection trial was to compare the objective tumor response to biweekly (every 2 weeks) gemcitabine/paclitaxel, gemcitabine/carboplatin, and gemcitabine/cisplatin as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients with stage IV disease who relapsed after anthracycline failure were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to gemcitabine (2,500 mg/m2) plus paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 (n = 49); plus carboplatin, area under the curve = 2.5 mg/mL × min (n = 47); or plus cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (n = 51). Study therapy continued up until a maximum of 8 cycles and follow-up continued for 24 months.

RESULTS

All patients were analyzed for efficacy and one patient was excluded from the safety analyses. The objective response was 26.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14.9-41.1] for gemcitabine/paclitaxel, 17.0% (95% CI 7.6-30.8) for gemcitabine/carboplatin, and 15.7% (95% CI 7.0-28.6) for gemcitabine/cisplatin. The adjusted odds ratio for tumor response was 0.33 (95% CI 0.10-1.06), P = 0.063 for gemcitabine/carboplatin versus gemcitabine/paclitaxel; 0.26 (95% CI 0.08-0.86), P = 0.027 for gemcitabine/cisplatin versus gemcitabine/paclitaxel; and 0.77 (95% CI 0.24-2.52), P = 0.671 for gemcitabine/cisplatin versus gemcitabine/carboplatin. There were no significant differences in overall survival or progression-free survival (P > 0.05). Grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events varied between groups and the majority of deaths (94.9%; 74/78) were related to disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

The gemcitabine-based treatments had comparable activity and tolerability. Similar survival characteristics and different toxicity profiles suggested that gemcitabine-platinum may be evaluated further in patients after anthracycline failure.

摘要

背景

这项多中心、开放标签、随机、平行、二期选择试验的主要目的是比较每周两次(每 2 周一次)吉西他滨/紫杉醇、吉西他滨/卡铂和吉西他滨/顺铂作为转移性乳腺癌一线治疗的客观肿瘤反应。

方法

纳入复发的蒽环类药物失败后的 IV 期疾病患者,按 1:1:1 的比例随机分配至吉西他滨(2500mg/m2)加紫杉醇 150mg/m2(n=49);加卡铂,曲线下面积=2.5mg/mL×min(n=47);或加顺铂 50mg/m2(n=51)。研究治疗持续最多 8 个周期,随访持续 24 个月。

结果

所有患者均进行了疗效分析,1 例患者被排除在安全性分析之外。客观缓解率为吉西他滨/紫杉醇组 26.5%(95%CI 14.9-41.1),吉西他滨/卡铂组 17.0%(95%CI 7.6-30.8),吉西他滨/顺铂组 15.7%(95%CI 7.0-28.6)。肿瘤反应的调整优势比为 0.33(95%CI 0.10-1.06),吉西他滨/卡铂与吉西他滨/紫杉醇相比,P=0.063;吉西他滨/顺铂与吉西他滨/紫杉醇相比,P=0.027;吉西他滨/顺铂与吉西他滨/卡铂相比,P=0.77(95%CI 0.24-2.52)。总生存和无进展生存无显著差异(P>0.05)。3 级或 4 级药物相关不良事件在各组之间存在差异,大多数死亡(94.9%;74/78)与疾病进展相关。

结论

基于吉西他滨的治疗具有相当的疗效和可耐受性。相似的生存特征和不同的毒性特征表明,吉西他滨-铂类药物可能在蒽环类药物失败后的患者中进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验