Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
Breast Cancer. 2011 Jul;18(3):203-12. doi: 10.1007/s12282-011-0260-y. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
The primary objective of this multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel, phase II selection trial was to compare the objective tumor response to biweekly (every 2 weeks) gemcitabine/paclitaxel, gemcitabine/carboplatin, and gemcitabine/cisplatin as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer.
Eligible patients with stage IV disease who relapsed after anthracycline failure were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to gemcitabine (2,500 mg/m2) plus paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 (n = 49); plus carboplatin, area under the curve = 2.5 mg/mL × min (n = 47); or plus cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (n = 51). Study therapy continued up until a maximum of 8 cycles and follow-up continued for 24 months.
All patients were analyzed for efficacy and one patient was excluded from the safety analyses. The objective response was 26.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14.9-41.1] for gemcitabine/paclitaxel, 17.0% (95% CI 7.6-30.8) for gemcitabine/carboplatin, and 15.7% (95% CI 7.0-28.6) for gemcitabine/cisplatin. The adjusted odds ratio for tumor response was 0.33 (95% CI 0.10-1.06), P = 0.063 for gemcitabine/carboplatin versus gemcitabine/paclitaxel; 0.26 (95% CI 0.08-0.86), P = 0.027 for gemcitabine/cisplatin versus gemcitabine/paclitaxel; and 0.77 (95% CI 0.24-2.52), P = 0.671 for gemcitabine/cisplatin versus gemcitabine/carboplatin. There were no significant differences in overall survival or progression-free survival (P > 0.05). Grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events varied between groups and the majority of deaths (94.9%; 74/78) were related to disease progression.
The gemcitabine-based treatments had comparable activity and tolerability. Similar survival characteristics and different toxicity profiles suggested that gemcitabine-platinum may be evaluated further in patients after anthracycline failure.
这项多中心、开放标签、随机、平行、二期选择试验的主要目的是比较每周两次(每 2 周一次)吉西他滨/紫杉醇、吉西他滨/卡铂和吉西他滨/顺铂作为转移性乳腺癌一线治疗的客观肿瘤反应。
纳入复发的蒽环类药物失败后的 IV 期疾病患者,按 1:1:1 的比例随机分配至吉西他滨(2500mg/m2)加紫杉醇 150mg/m2(n=49);加卡铂,曲线下面积=2.5mg/mL×min(n=47);或加顺铂 50mg/m2(n=51)。研究治疗持续最多 8 个周期,随访持续 24 个月。
所有患者均进行了疗效分析,1 例患者被排除在安全性分析之外。客观缓解率为吉西他滨/紫杉醇组 26.5%(95%CI 14.9-41.1),吉西他滨/卡铂组 17.0%(95%CI 7.6-30.8),吉西他滨/顺铂组 15.7%(95%CI 7.0-28.6)。肿瘤反应的调整优势比为 0.33(95%CI 0.10-1.06),吉西他滨/卡铂与吉西他滨/紫杉醇相比,P=0.063;吉西他滨/顺铂与吉西他滨/紫杉醇相比,P=0.027;吉西他滨/顺铂与吉西他滨/卡铂相比,P=0.77(95%CI 0.24-2.52)。总生存和无进展生存无显著差异(P>0.05)。3 级或 4 级药物相关不良事件在各组之间存在差异,大多数死亡(94.9%;74/78)与疾病进展相关。
基于吉西他滨的治疗具有相当的疗效和可耐受性。相似的生存特征和不同的毒性特征表明,吉西他滨-铂类药物可能在蒽环类药物失败后的患者中进一步评估。