Safdar Zeenat
Division of Pulmonary-Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:119-24. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S15026. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
Currently available endothelin receptor antagonists for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension block either the endothelin (ET) receptor A or both A and B receptors. Transition from one endothelin receptor antagonist to another may theoretically alter side-effects or efficacy. We report our experience of a transition from sitaxsentan to ambrisentan, both predominant ET(A) receptor antagonists, in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients.
At Baylor Pulmonary Hypertension Center, 18 patients enrolled in the open-label extension phase of the original sitaxsentan studies (Sitaxsentan To Relieve ImpaireD Exercise) were transitioned to ambrisentan (from July 2007 to September 2007) at the time of study closure. Pre-transition (PreT), 1 month (1Mth) and 1 year (1Yr) post-transition assessments of 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), brain naturetic peptide (BNP) levels, WHO functional class (WHO FC), Borg dyspnea score (BDS), oxygen saturation, liver function, and peripheral edema were compared.
6MWD was 356 ± 126 m at PreT, 361 ± 125 m at 1Mth, and 394 ± 114 m at 1Yr (mean ± SD). There was no difference in the walk distance at 1Mth and 1Yr post transition compared with PreT (P=0.92, 0.41 respectively). Oxygen saturation was no different at 1Mth and 1Yr to PreT level (P=0.49 and P=0.06 respectively). BNP was 178 ± 44 pg/mL at PreT, 129 ± 144 pg/mL at 1Mth and 157 ± 201 at 1Yr. Peripheral edema was present in 7/18 patients at PreT, in 8/16 patients at 1Mth, and in 6/13 patients at 1Yr post transition. Proportions of patients with edema over these 3 time points did not change significantly (P=0.803). At 1Yr, 2 patients had died, 1 had undergone lung transplantation, 1 had relocated, and 1 patient was started on intravenous prostacyclin therapy. Over 3 points (baseline, 1 month, and 1 year), there was no significant change in function class (P=0.672).
Our limited data suggest that ET(A) receptor antagonists can be switched from one to another with sustained exercise capacity and maintained WHO FC with no increase in incidence of peripheral edema.
目前用于治疗肺动脉高压的内皮素受体拮抗剂可阻断内皮素(ET)A受体或同时阻断A和B受体。理论上,从一种内皮素受体拮抗剂转换为另一种可能会改变副作用或疗效。我们报告了在肺动脉高压患者中从sitaxsentan转换为安立生坦(二者均为主要的ET(A)受体拮抗剂)的经验。
在贝勒肺动脉高压中心,18名参加了原sitaxsentan研究(Sitaxsentan To Relieve ImpaireD Exercise)开放标签延长期的患者在研究结束时(2007年7月至2007年9月)转换为安立生坦。比较了转换前(PreT)、转换后1个月(1Mth)和1年(1Yr)时的6分钟步行距离(6MWD)、脑钠肽(BNP)水平、世界卫生组织功能分级(WHO FC)、Borg呼吸困难评分(BDS)、血氧饱和度、肝功能和外周水肿情况。
PreT时6MWD为356±126米,1Mth时为361±125米,1Yr时为394±114米(均值±标准差)。与PreT相比,转换后1Mth和1Yr时的步行距离无差异(P分别为0.92和0.41)。1Mth和1Yr时的血氧饱和度与PreT水平无差异(P分别为0.49和0.06)。PreT时BNP为178±44 pg/mL,1Mth时为129±144 pg/mL,1Yr时为157±201 pg/mL。转换前18例患者中有7例出现外周水肿,转换后1Mth时16例患者中有8例出现,1Yr时13例患者中有6例出现。这3个时间点出现水肿的患者比例无显著变化(P=0.803)。1Yr时,2例患者死亡,1例接受了肺移植,1例搬迁,1例患者开始接受静脉前列环素治疗。在3个时间点(基线、1个月和1年),功能分级无显著变化(P=0.672)。
我们有限的数据表明,ET(A)受体拮抗剂可以从一种转换为另一种,且运动能力得以维持,世界卫生组织功能分级保持不变,外周水肿发生率未增加。