文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期，新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

从三维重建图像与传统二维图像比较的头影测量。

Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2011 Sep;81(5):856-64. doi: 10.2319/121210-717.1. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

DOI:10.2319/121210-717.1
PMID:21469969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8916191/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the values of different measurements taken on three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) are comparable with those taken on two-dimensional (2D) images from conventional lateral cephalometric radiographs (LCRs) and to examine if there are differences between the different types of CBCT software when taking those measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight patients were selected who had both an LRC and a CBCT. The 3D reconstructions of each patient in the CBCT were evaluated using two different software packages, NemoCeph 3D and InVivo5. An observer took 10 angular and 3 linear measurements on each of the three types of record on two different occasions. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability was high except for the mandibular plane and facial cone (from the LCR), the Na-Ans distance (using NemoCeph 3D), and facial cone and the Ans-Me distance (using InVivo5). No statistically significant differences were found for the angular and linear measurements between the LCRs and the CBCTs for any measurement, and the correlation levels were high for all measurements. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant differences were found between the angular and linear measurements taken with the LCR and those taken with the CBCT. Neither were there any statistically significant differences between the angular or linear measurements using the two CBCT software packages.

摘要

目的：评估从锥形束计算机断层扫描（CBCT）的三维（3D）重建中获取的不同测量值与从传统侧位头颅侧位片（LCR）获取的二维（2D）图像的测量值是否可比，并检查在获取这些测量值时，不同类型的 CBCT 软件之间是否存在差异。

材料和方法：选择了 8 名同时接受 LCR 和 CBCT 的患者。使用两种不同的软件包（NemoCeph 3D 和 InVivo5）对每位患者的 CBCT 3D 重建进行评估。一位观察者在两次不同的时间，在三种记录类型上的每一种记录上进行了 10 个角度和 3 个线性测量。

结果：除了下颌平面和面部锥体（来自 LCR）、Na-Ans 距离（使用 NemoCeph 3D）以及面部锥体和 Ans-Me 距离（使用 InVivo5）外，观察者的内部可靠性都很高。对于任何测量，LCR 和 CBCT 之间的角度和线性测量均未发现统计学差异，并且所有测量的相关性水平都很高。

结论：LCR 和 CBCT 之间的角度和线性测量值之间没有发现统计学差异。在使用两种 CBCT 软件包进行的角度或线性测量之间也没有发现统计学差异。

相似文献

[1]
Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images.

Angle Orthod. 2011-4-7

[2]
A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009-12-30

[3]
Comparison between full face and hemifacial CBCT cephalograms in clinically symmetrical patients: a pilot study.

Dental Press J Orthod. 2015

[4]
Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.

Angle Orthod. 2008-5

[5]
"Ten-point" 3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography.

Prog Orthod. 2010-5-11

[6]
Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.

Aust Orthod J. 2012-11

[7]
Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.

Clin Oral Investig. 2010-7-17

[8]
A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.

Eur J Oral Sci. 2009-6

[9]
Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review.

Angle Orthod. 2015-1

[10]
Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016-2

引用本文的文献

[1]
Comparison of conventional two-dimensional and digital three-dimensional imaging in orthodontics : A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Orofac Orthop. 2025-2-20

[2]
Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetries in Caucasian adult patients with different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns. A cone beam study using 3D segmentation and mirroring procedures.

Head Face Med. 2023-12-14

[3]
Prediction of condylar movement envelope surface based on facial morphology.

Heliyon. 2023-7-7

[4]
Effects of Elastodontic Appliance on the Pharyngeal Airway Space in Class II Malocclusion.

J Clin Med. 2023-6-26

[5]
Computerized three-dimensional cephalometric template for Thai adults.

Heliyon. 2023-4-1

[6]
Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based algorithm for automated localization of craniofacial landmarks.

Clin Oral Investig. 2023-5

[7]
Assessment of Maxillary Incisors' Angulation and Position in Different Types of Malocclusions Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Contemp Clin Dent. 2021

[8]
Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Current Image Acquisition and Processing Techniques.

Front Surg. 2020-12-7

[9]
A 3D cephalometric protocol for the accurate quantification of the craniofacial symmetry and facial growth.

J Biol Eng. 2019-5-17

[10]
Cephalometrics of Pharyngeal Airway Space in Lebanese Adults.

Int J Dent. 2017

本文引用的文献

[1]
Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images.

Angle Orthod. 2011-1

[2]
Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.

Clin Oral Investig. 2010-7-17

[3]
A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements.

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010-2

[4]
A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009-12-30

[5]
Accuracy and landmark error calculation using cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.

Angle Orthod. 2010-3

[6]
Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009-8

[7]
A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.

Eur J Oral Sci. 2009-6

[8]
A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009-7

[9]
Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images.

Angle Orthod. 2009-1

[10]
Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.

Eur J Orthod. 2009-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索