• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images.从三维重建图像与传统二维图像比较的头影测量。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Sep;81(5):856-64. doi: 10.2319/121210-717.1. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
2
A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.二维和三维头影测量在人类颅骨 CBCT 扫描中的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;39(2):156-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.017. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
3
Comparison between full face and hemifacial CBCT cephalograms in clinically symmetrical patients: a pilot study.临床对称患者全脸与半脸CBCT头颅侧位片的比较：一项初步研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Mar-Apr;20(2):83-9. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.2.083-089.oar.
4
Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.使用正畸容积再现程序构建的锥形束CT衍生三维图像的线性准确性和可靠性。
Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):387-95. doi: 10.2319/122106-52.1.
5
"Ten-point" 3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography.采用低剂量锥形束 CT 的“十点”3D 头影测量分析。
Prog Orthod. 2010;11(1):2-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pio.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 May 11.
6
Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.传统头颅侧位片、数字化头颅侧位片和CT衍生头颅侧位片的测量：一项比较研究。
Aust Orthod J. 2012 Nov;28(2):232-9.
7
Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.基于两种不同锥形束 CT 扫描仪的人类颅骨 3D 模型的测量。
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Oct;15(5):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0440-8. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
8
A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.人类颅骨正位X线片和锥形束计算机断层扫描上二维与三维头影测量的比较。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Jun;117(3):300-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00633.x.
9
Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review.基于三维的头影测量分析的新定义标志点：一项回顾性锥形束计算机断层扫描回顾
Angle Orthod. 2015 Jan;85(1):3-10. doi: 10.2319/021814-120.1.
10
Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估面部软硬组织不对称性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Feb;149(2):225-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.038.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of conventional two-dimensional and digital three-dimensional imaging in orthodontics : A systematic review and meta-analysis.正畸学中传统二维成像与数字三维成像的比较：一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Feb 20. doi: 10.1007/s00056-024-00574-7.
2
Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetries in Caucasian adult patients with different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns. A cone beam study using 3D segmentation and mirroring procedures.不同矢状面和垂直骨面型的白种成人患者下颌不对称的三维定量研究。使用 3D 分割和镜像程序的锥形束研究。
Head Face Med. 2023 Dec 14;19(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13005-023-00400-2.
3
Prediction of condylar movement envelope surface based on facial morphology.基于面部形态学的髁突运动包络面预测
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 7;9(7):e17769. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17769. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Effects of Elastodontic Appliance on the Pharyngeal Airway Space in Class II Malocclusion.弹性正畸矫治器对安氏II类错牙合患者咽气道间隙的影响。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 26;12(13):4280. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134280.
5
Computerized three-dimensional cephalometric template for Thai adults.泰国成年人的计算机化三维头影测量模板。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):e15077. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15077. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based algorithm for automated localization of craniofacial landmarks.基于人工智能的算法自动定位颅面标志的评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May;27(5):2255-2265. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04978-4. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
7
Assessment of Maxillary Incisors' Angulation and Position in Different Types of Malocclusions Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估不同类型错牙合畸形中上颌切牙的角度和位置
Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Oct-Dec;12(4):401-407. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_743_20. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
8
Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Current Image Acquisition and Processing Techniques.面部重建：当前图像采集与处理技术的系统综述
Front Surg. 2020 Dec 7;7:537616. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.537616. eCollection 2020.
9
A 3D cephalometric protocol for the accurate quantification of the craniofacial symmetry and facial growth.一种用于精确量化颅面对称性和面部生长的三维头影测量方案。
J Biol Eng. 2019 May 17;13:42. doi: 10.1186/s13036-019-0171-6. eCollection 2019.
10
Cephalometrics of Pharyngeal Airway Space in Lebanese Adults.黎巴嫩成年人咽部气道空间的头影测量学
Int J Dent. 2017;2017:3959456. doi: 10.1155/2017/3959456. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images.比较 CT 三维重建与传统二维头影测量图像常见硬组织测量指标。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Jan;81(1):11-16. doi: 10.2319/031710-157.1.
2
Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.基于两种不同锥形束 CT 扫描仪的人类颅骨 3D 模型的测量。
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Oct;15(5):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0440-8. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
3
A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements.二维放射摄影与三维计算机断层扫描在角度头影测量中的比较。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Feb;39(2):100-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/82724776.
4
A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.二维和三维头影测量在人类颅骨 CBCT 扫描中的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;39(2):156-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.017. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
5
Accuracy and landmark error calculation using cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描生成的头颅侧位片计算准确性和标志点误差。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Mar;80(2):286-94. doi: 10.2319/030909-135.1.
6
Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans.锥形束计算机断层扫描重建图像的准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Aug;136(2):156.e1-6; discussion 156-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.006.
7
A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.人类颅骨正位X线片和锥形束计算机断层扫描上二维与三维头影测量的比较。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Jun;117(3):300-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00633.x.
8
A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls.锥形束CT扫描获得的人类头骨正位X线片与传统正位X线片的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jul;38(7):773-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.024. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
9
Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images.锥形束CT衍生3D图像的线性精度。
Angle Orthod. 2009 Jan;79(1):150-7. doi: 10.2319/122407-599.1.
10
Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.锥形束计算机断层扫描表面重建图像用于头影测量分析的三维测量准确性：患者扫描位置的影响
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Apr;31(2):129-34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn088. Epub 2008 Dec 23.

从三维重建图像与传统二维图像比较的头影测量。

Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2011 Sep;81(5):856-64. doi: 10.2319/121210-717.1. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

DOI:10.2319/121210-717.1
PMID:21469969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8916191/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the values of different measurements taken on three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) are comparable with those taken on two-dimensional (2D) images from conventional lateral cephalometric radiographs (LCRs) and to examine if there are differences between the different types of CBCT software when taking those measurements.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eight patients were selected who had both an LRC and a CBCT. The 3D reconstructions of each patient in the CBCT were evaluated using two different software packages, NemoCeph 3D and InVivo5. An observer took 10 angular and 3 linear measurements on each of the three types of record on two different occasions.

RESULTS

Intraobserver reliability was high except for the mandibular plane and facial cone (from the LCR), the Na-Ans distance (using NemoCeph 3D), and facial cone and the Ans-Me distance (using InVivo5). No statistically significant differences were found for the angular and linear measurements between the LCRs and the CBCTs for any measurement, and the correlation levels were high for all measurements.

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant differences were found between the angular and linear measurements taken with the LCR and those taken with the CBCT. Neither were there any statistically significant differences between the angular or linear measurements using the two CBCT software packages.

摘要

目的

评估从锥形束计算机断层扫描（CBCT）的三维（3D）重建中获取的不同测量值与从传统侧位头颅侧位片（LCR）获取的二维（2D）图像的测量值是否可比，并检查在获取这些测量值时，不同类型的 CBCT 软件之间是否存在差异。

材料和方法

选择了 8 名同时接受 LCR 和 CBCT 的患者。使用两种不同的软件包（NemoCeph 3D 和 InVivo5）对每位患者的 CBCT 3D 重建进行评估。一位观察者在两次不同的时间，在三种记录类型上的每一种记录上进行了 10 个角度和 3 个线性测量。

结果

除了下颌平面和面部锥体（来自 LCR）、Na-Ans 距离（使用 NemoCeph 3D）以及面部锥体和 Ans-Me 距离（使用 InVivo5）外，观察者的内部可靠性都很高。对于任何测量，LCR 和 CBCT 之间的角度和线性测量均未发现统计学差异，并且所有测量的相关性水平都很高。

结论

LCR 和 CBCT 之间的角度和线性测量值之间没有发现统计学差异。在使用两种 CBCT 软件包进行的角度或线性测量之间也没有发现统计学差异。