Van Tongel Alexander, Ackerman Pieter, Liekens Koen, Berghs Bart
AZ St Jan Hospital, Brugge, Belgium.
Acta Orthop Belg. 2011 Feb;77(1):21-6.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate a reduction method that is based on the theory of Evans to reduce angulated greenstick fractures of the distal forearm with a rotation manoeuvre, to evaluate an immobilisation technique and to evaluate a brief survey on surgeon practice for treatment of these fractures. A retrospective study was performed on 21 patients. Fractures were reduced with a pronation or supination manoeuvre depending on the angulation of the fracture and were immobilised in pronation or supination. A good reduction was achieved in all patients. Six weeks after manipulation a loss of reduction was seen in 6 out of 21 patients, but with a reangulation of less than 15 degrees. There was no significant difference between fractures immobilized in pronation or in supination. There was no need for remanipulation. At the 2008 Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation (OTC) meeting, a brief informal survey was performed concerning the reduction method and the use of K-wires after reduction. No surgeons indicated they would perform only a rotation manoeuvre.
本研究的目的是评估一种基于埃文斯理论的复位方法,该方法通过旋转手法来复位前臂远端成角的青枝骨折,评估一种固定技术,并评估关于外科医生治疗这些骨折的实践的简要调查。对21例患者进行了回顾性研究。根据骨折的成角情况,通过旋前或旋后手法进行骨折复位,并固定于旋前或旋后位。所有患者均实现了良好的复位。手法复位后6周,21例患者中有6例出现复位丢失,但再成角小于15度。旋前或旋后固定的骨折之间无显著差异。无需再次手法复位。在2008年骨内固定与创伤护理基金会(OTC)会议上,就复位方法及复位后克氏针的使用进行了一次简短的非正式调查。没有外科医生表示他们只会采用旋转手法。