Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Ann Surg. 2011 Apr;253(4):689-98. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821111b5.
We analyzed the long-term outcome of patients operated for esophageal cancer and evaluated the new seventh edition of the tumor-node-metastasis classification for cancers of the esophagus.
Retrospective analysis and new classification.
Data of a single-center cohort of 2920 patients operated for cancers of the esophagus according to the seventh edition are presented. Statistical methods to evaluate survival and the prognostic performance of the staging systems included Kaplan-Meier analyses and time-dependent receiver-operating-characteristic-analysis.
Union Internationale Contre le Cancer stage, R-status, histologic tumor type and age were identified as independent prognostic factors for cancers of the esophagus. Grade and tumor site, additional parameters in the new American Joint Cancer Committee prognostic groupings, were not significantly correlated with survival. Esophageal adenocarcinoma showed a significantly better long-term prognosis after resection than squamous cell carcinoma (P < 0.0001). The new number-dependent N-classification proved superior to the former site-dependent classification with significantly decreasing prognosis with the increasing number of lymph node metastases (P < 0.001). The new subclassification of T1 tumors also revealed significant differences in prognosis between pT1a and pT1b patients (P < 0.001). However, the multiple new Union Internationale Contre le Cancer and American Joint Cancer Committee subgroupings did not prove distinctive for survival between stages IIA and IIB, between IIIA and IIIB, and between IIIC and IV.
The new seventh edition of the tumor-node-metastasis classification improved the predictive ability for cancers of the esophagus; however, stage groups could be condensed to a clinically relevant number. Differences in patient characteristics, pathogenesis, and especially survival clearly identify adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus as 2 separate tumor entities requiring differentiated therapeutic concepts.
我们分析了接受食管癌手术治疗患者的长期预后,并评估了肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分期系统的第 7 版在食管癌中的应用。
回顾性分析和新分类。
本研究呈现了单中心 2920 例食管癌患者的第 7 版 TNM 分期数据。用于评估生存和分期系统预后性能的统计方法包括 Kaplan-Meier 分析和时间依赖性接受者操作特征分析。
国际抗癌联盟(UICC)分期、R 状态、组织学肿瘤类型和年龄被确定为食管癌的独立预后因素。新美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)预后分组中的分级和肿瘤部位是附加参数,与生存无显著相关性。与鳞癌相比,食管腺癌切除术后具有显著更好的长期预后(P < 0.0001)。新的基于淋巴结转移数的 N 分类优于以前的基于淋巴结转移部位的分类,随着淋巴结转移数的增加,预后显著降低(P < 0.001)。T1 肿瘤的新亚分类也显示出 pT1a 和 pT1b 患者之间在预后方面的显著差异(P < 0.001)。然而,新的多个国际抗癌联盟和 AJCC 亚组在 IIA 期和 IIB 期、IIIA 期和 IIIB 期以及 IIIC 期和 IV 期之间的生存方面并没有明显区别。
肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分期系统的第 7 版提高了对食管癌的预测能力;然而,分期组可以简化为具有临床相关性的数量。患者特征、发病机制,特别是生存方面的差异清楚地将食管腺癌和鳞癌鉴定为 2 种不同的肿瘤实体,需要差异化的治疗概念。