Center for Resuscitation Science and Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Resuscitation. 2011 Aug;82(8):1019-24. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.02.032. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
Successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest requires the delivery of high-quality chest compressions, encompassing parameters such as adequate rate, depth, and full recoil between compressions. The lack of compression recoil ("leaning" or "incomplete recoil") has been shown to adversely affect hemodynamics in experimental arrest models, but the prevalence of leaning during actual resuscitation is poorly understood. We hypothesized that leaning varies across resuscitation events, possibly due to rescuer and/or patient characteristics and may worsen over time from rescuer fatigue during continuous chest compressions.
This was an observational clinical cohort study at one academic medical center. Data were collected from adult in-hospital and Emergency Department arrest events using monitor/defibrillators that record chest compression characteristics and provide real-time feedback.
We analyzed 112,569 chest compressions from 108 arrest episodes from 5/2007 to 2/2009. Leaning was present in 98/108 (91%) cases; 12% of all compressions exhibited leaning. Leaning varied widely across cases: 41/108 (38%) of arrest episodes exhibited <5% leaning yet 20/108 (19%) demonstrated >20% compression leaning. When evaluating blocks of continuous compressions (>120 s), only 4/33 (12%) had an increase in leaning over time and 29/33 (88%) showed a decrease (p<0.001).
Chest compression leaning was common during resuscitation care and exhibited a wide distribution, with most leaning within a subset of resuscitations. Leaning decreased over time during continuous chest compression blocks, suggesting that either leaning may not be a function of rescuer fatiguing, or that it may have been mitigated by automated feedback provided during resuscitation episodes.
心脏骤停的复苏成功需要提供高质量的胸外按压,包括适当的按压频率、深度和按压之间的完全回弹。实验性停搏模型表明,缺乏按压回弹(“倾斜”或“不完全回弹”)会对血液动力学产生不利影响,但实际复苏过程中倾斜的发生率知之甚少。我们假设,由于抢救者和/或患者的特点,倾斜在复苏事件中有所不同,并且由于连续胸外按压过程中抢救者疲劳,倾斜可能会随着时间的推移而恶化。
这是一家学术医疗中心的观察性临床队列研究。使用记录胸外按压特征并提供实时反馈的监测/除颤器从院内和急诊室成人停搏事件中收集数据。
我们分析了 2007 年 5 月至 2009 年 2 月期间 108 次停搏事件中的 112569 次胸外按压。在 108 例中,98 例(91%)存在倾斜;所有按压的 12%存在倾斜。倾斜在病例之间差异很大:41/108(38%)的停搏事件显示<5%的倾斜,而 20/108(19%)的倾斜程度超过 20%。当评估连续按压>120 秒的块时,只有 4/33(12%)随着时间的推移倾斜增加,而 29/33(88%)倾斜减少(p<0.001)。
在复苏护理过程中,胸外按压倾斜很常见,分布广泛,大多数倾斜发生在一组复苏中。在连续胸外按压块期间,倾斜随着时间的推移而减少,这表明倾斜可能不是抢救者疲劳的函数,或者在复苏过程中通过提供自动反馈来减轻了倾斜。