• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FOCUS 1 和 FOCUS 2 试验的综合安全性总结:III 期随机、双盲研究,评估头孢洛林酯治疗社区获得性肺炎患者。

Integrated safety summary of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2 trials: Phase III randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

机构信息

Cerexa, Inc., Oakland, CA 94612, USA.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii53-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr099.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dkr099
PMID:21482570
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Ceftaroline fosamil, the prodrug of the active metabolite ceftaroline, is a broad-spectrum, parenteral cephalosporin approved for treatment of moderate to severe bacterial infections, including community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This report provides an integrated safety summary of the ceFtarOline Community-acquired pneUmonia trial versuS ceftriaxone (FOCUS) 1 and 2 trials (registration numbers: NCT00621504 and NCT00509106).

METHODS

Patients hospitalized with CAP requiring intravenous therapy and having Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) risk class scores of III or IV were randomized (1:1) to receive 600 mg of ceftaroline fosamil administered intravenously every 12 h or 1 g of ceftriaxone administered intravenously every 24 h for 5-7 days. All patients were followed for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring from the start of the initial study drug infusion up to the test-of-cure visit; serious adverse events (SAEs) including deaths occurring up to the late follow-up visit or within 30 days after the last dose were additionally recorded. Scheduled laboratory testing was conducted up to the test-of-cure visit; unscheduled testing continued up to the late follow-up visit.

RESULTS

A total of 1228 patients (613 in the ceftaroline fosamil group and 615 in the ceftriaxone group) received any amount of drug and were included in the safety analysis. The incidences of TEAEs (47.0% versus 45.7%), SAEs (11.3% versus 11.7%), discontinuations (4.4% versus 4.1%) and deaths (2.4% versus 2.0%) were similar between the ceftaroline fosamil and the ceftriaxone groups, respectively. Diarrhoea (4.2%), headache (3.4%) and insomnia (3.1%) were the most commonly reported TEAEs in patients treated with ceftaroline fosamil. The distribution of TEAEs based on severity was also similar between groups, and the majority of patients in both treatment groups (∼75%) had either no TEAEs or only mild TEAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The data from the FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2 trials presented in this integrated safety summary demonstrate that ceftaroline fosamil is well tolerated, with a tolerability profile similar to ceftriaxone and the cephalosporin class overall, with no unexpected safety concerns being identified.

摘要

目的

头孢洛林酯前体药物头孢洛林的活性代谢物,是一种广谱的、注射用头孢菌素,用于治疗包括社区获得性肺炎(CAP)在内的中重度细菌感染。本报告提供了头孢洛林治疗社区获得性肺炎试验与头孢曲松对比(FOCUS)1 和 2 试验(注册号:NCT00621504 和 NCT00509106)的综合安全性总结。

方法

需要静脉治疗且肺炎结局研究小组(PORT)风险评分 III 或 IV 的 CAP 住院患者被随机(1:1)接受每 12 小时静脉注射 600mg 头孢洛林酯或每 24 小时静脉注射 1g 头孢曲松,疗程为 5-7 天。所有患者在初始研究药物输注开始至治愈期访视期间均接受治疗期间出现的不良事件(TEAEs)监测;此外还记录了直至随访结束访视或末次给药后 30 天内的严重不良事件(SAE),包括死亡。直至治愈期访视时进行计划实验室检测;直至随访结束访视时进行非计划检测。

结果

共 1228 例患者(头孢洛林酯组 613 例,头孢曲松组 615 例)接受了任何剂量的药物治疗,并纳入安全性分析。头孢洛林酯组和头孢曲松组的 TEAEs(47.0%与 45.7%)、SAEs(11.3%与 11.7%)、停药(4.4%与 4.1%)和死亡(2.4%与 2.0%)发生率相似。腹泻(4.2%)、头痛(3.4%)和失眠(3.1%)是接受头孢洛林酯治疗的患者中最常见的 TEAEs。两组基于严重程度的 TEAEs 分布也相似,两组大多数患者(~75%)均无 TEAEs 或仅有轻度 TEAEs。

结论

本综合安全性总结中 FOCUS 1 和 FOCUS 2 试验的数据表明,头孢洛林酯耐受性良好,与头孢曲松和整个头孢菌素类药物的耐受性特征相似,未发现新的安全性问题。

相似文献

1
Integrated safety summary of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2 trials: Phase III randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.FOCUS 1 和 FOCUS 2 试验的综合安全性总结:III 期随机、双盲研究,评估头孢洛林酯治疗社区获得性肺炎患者。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii53-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr099.
2
FOCUS 1: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia.重点 1:头孢洛林酯氨噻肟与头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、多中心、III 期临床试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii19-32. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr096.
3
FOCUS 2: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia.重点 2:头孢洛林酯氨噻肟与头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、多中心 III 期临床试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii33-44. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr097.
4
Integrated safety summary of CANVAS 1 and 2 trials: Phase III, randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections.CANVAS 1 和 2 试验的综合安全性总结:III 期、随机、双盲研究,评估头孢洛林酯治疗复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染患者。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Nov;65 Suppl 4:iv67-iv71. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq256.
5
Integrated analysis of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2: randomized, doubled-blinded, multicenter phase 3 trials of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.FOCUS 1 和 FOCUS 2 的综合分析:头孢洛林酯氨噻肟与头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、多中心 3 期临床试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Dec 15;51(12):1395-405. doi: 10.1086/657313. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
6
A Multicenter, Randomized, Observer-blinded, Active-controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of Ceftaroline Compared With Ceftriaxone Plus Vancomycin in Pediatric Patients With Complicated Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia.一项多中心、随机、观察者盲法、活性对照研究,评估头孢洛林与头孢曲松加万古霉素相比在患有复杂性社区获得性细菌性肺炎的儿科患者中的安全性和有效性。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016 Jul;35(7):760-6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001160.
7
A Randomized, Prospective Study of Pediatric Patients With Community-acquired Pneumonia Treated With Ceftaroline Versus Ceftriaxone.头孢洛林与头孢曲松治疗儿童社区获得性肺炎的随机前瞻性研究
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016 Jul;35(7):752-9. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001159.
8
Ceftaroline fosamil for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: findings from FOCUS 1 and 2 and potential role in therapy.头孢洛林酯治疗社区获得性肺炎:FOCUS 1 和 2 的研究结果及其在治疗中的潜在作用。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011 Aug;9(8):567-72. doi: 10.1586/eri.11.82.
9
Ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of Asian patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority with nested superiority trial.头孢呋肟磷酯与头孢曲松治疗亚洲社区获得性肺炎患者的比较:一项随机、对照、双盲、Ⅲ期、非劣效性、嵌套优效性临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Feb;15(2):161-71. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71018-7. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
10
Ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.头孢呋肟酯与头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎的比较:随机对照试验的个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Apr;71(4):862-70. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv415. Epub 2015 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Heartfelt Impact: A Descriptive Analysis of Ceftaroline-Containing Regimens in Endocarditis due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.深切影响:对含头孢洛林方案治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的心内膜炎的描述性分析
Infect Dis Ther. 2024 Dec;13(12):2649-2662. doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-01068-0. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
2
Comparing Several Treatments with Antibiotics for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.比较几种治疗方法与抗生素治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2021 Jun;50(6):1108-1119. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i6.6410.
3
Plasma and Lung Tissue Pharmacokinetics of Ceftaroline Fosamil in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: an Microdialysis Study.
心脏手术体外循环患者中头孢洛林磷酸酯的血浆和肺组织药代动力学:一项微透析研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Sep 17;65(10):e0067921. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00679-21. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
4
No Evidence for Ceftobiprole-Induced Immune Hemolytic Anemia in Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials.三项3期临床试验中无头孢比普诱导免疫性溶血性贫血的证据。
Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Sep 16;13:3209-3215. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S268269. eCollection 2020.
5
New and promising anti-bacterials: Can this promise be sustained?新型且有前景的抗菌药物:这一前景能否持续?
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jan-Mar;36(1):13-19. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_113_19. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
6
Neurological and Psychiatric Adverse Effects of Antimicrobials.抗菌药物的神经和精神不良反应。
CNS Drugs. 2019 Aug;33(8):727-753. doi: 10.1007/s40263-019-00649-9.
7
Efficacy and safety of ceftaroline: systematic review and meta-analysis.头孢洛林的疗效与安全性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 2;6:2049936118808655. doi: 10.1177/2049936118808655. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
8
Early Use of Ceftaroline Fosamil in the United States Veterans Health Care System.美国退伍军人医疗保健系统中 ceftaroline fosamil 的早期使用。
Drugs. 2017 Aug;77(12):1345-1351. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0785-2.
9
Ceftaroline Fosamil: A Review in Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections and Community-Acquired Pneumonia.头孢替唑肟酯:在复杂性皮肤和软组织感染及社区获得性肺炎中的应用评价。
Drugs. 2016 Nov;76(17):1659-1674. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0654-4.
10
A Phase III, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial of ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg every 8 h versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infection with systemic inflammatory response or underlying comorbidities.一项针对伴有全身炎症反应或基础合并症的复杂皮肤及软组织感染患者的III期随机对照非劣效性试验,比较每8小时使用600毫克头孢洛林酯与万古霉素加氨曲南的疗效。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Dec;71(12):3575-3584. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw333. Epub 2016 Sep 1.