Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany.
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):1987-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.9245. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
To compare low-dose decitabine to best supportive care (BSC) in higher-risk patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) age 60 years or older and ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.
Two-hundred thirty-three patients (median age, 70 years; range, 60 to 90 years) were enrolled; 53% had poor-risk cytogenetics, and the median MDS duration at random assignment was 3 months. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Decitabine (15 mg/m(2)) was given intravenously over 4 hours three times a day for 3 days in 6-week cycles.
OS prolongation with decitabine versus BSC was not statistically significant (median OS, 10.1 v 8.5 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.17; two-sided, log-rank P = .38). Progression-free survival (PFS), but not acute myeloid leukemia (AML) -free survival (AMLFS), was significantly prolonged with decitabine versus BSC (median PFS, 6.6 v 3.0 months, respectively; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.88; P = .004; median AMLFS, 8.8 v 6.1 months, respectively; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.12; P = .24). AML transformation was significantly (P = .036) reduced at 1 year (from 33% with BSC to 22% with decitabine). Multivariate analyses indicated that patients with short MDS duration had worse outcomes. Best responses with decitabine versus BSC, respectively, were as follows: complete response (13% v 0%), partial response (6% v 0%), hematologic improvement (15% v 2%), stable disease (14% v 22%), progressive disease (29% v 68%), hypoplasia (14% v 0%), and inevaluable (8% v 8%). Grade 3 to 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 25% of patients on decitabine versus 7% of patients on BSC; grade 3 to 4 infections occurred in 57% and 52% of patients on decitabine and BSC, respectively. Decitabine treatment was associated with improvements in patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) parameters.
Decitabine administered in 6-week cycles is active in older patients with higher-risk MDS, resulting in improvements of OS and AMLFS (nonsignificant), of PFS and AML transformation (significant), and of QOL. Short MDS duration was an independent adverse prognosticator.
比较低剂量地西他滨与最佳支持治疗(BSC)在年龄 60 岁或以上、不适合强化化疗的高危骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者中的疗效。
共纳入 233 例患者(中位年龄 70 岁;范围 60 至 90 岁);53%患者的细胞遗传学预后不良,随机分组时 MDS 持续时间的中位数为 3 个月。主要终点为总生存期(OS)。地西他滨(15mg/m2)以 4 小时静脉滴注,每天 3 次,6 周为 1 个周期。
地西他滨与 BSC 相比 OS 延长无统计学意义(中位 OS 分别为 10.1 个月和 8.5 个月,风险比 [HR],0.88;95%CI,0.66 至 1.17;双侧,对数秩 P =.38)。地西他滨与 BSC 相比,无进展生存期(PFS)而非急性髓细胞白血病(AML)无进展生存期(AMLFS)显著延长(中位 PFS 分别为 6.6 个月和 3.0 个月,HR,0.68;95%CI,0.52 至 0.88;P =.004;中位 AMLFS 分别为 8.8 个月和 6.1 个月,HR,0.85;95%CI,0.64 至 1.12;P =.24)。AML 转化率在 1 年内显著降低(BSC 组为 33%,地西他滨组为 22%;P =.036)。多变量分析表明 MDS 持续时间较短的患者预后较差。地西他滨与 BSC 的最佳反应分别为:完全缓解(13%比 0%)、部分缓解(6%比 0%)、血液学改善(15%比 2%)、稳定疾病(14%比 22%)、进展性疾病(29%比 68%)、骨髓增生低下(14%比 0%)和无法评估(8%比 8%)。地西他滨组有 25%的患者发生 3 级至 4 级发热性中性粒细胞减少症,BSC 组为 7%;地西他滨组和 BSC 组分别有 57%和 52%的患者发生 3 级至 4 级感染。地西他滨治疗可改善患者报告的生活质量(QOL)参数。
6 周为 1 个周期的地西他滨在年龄较大、MDS 风险较高的患者中具有活性,可改善 OS 和 AMLFS(无统计学意义)、PFS 和 AML 转化率(有统计学意义)以及 QOL。MDS 持续时间较短是独立的不良预后因素。