Sun Jian-hua, Yan An, Wang Peng-cheng, Zhang Xin-hu, Lin Yong-sheng, Liu Yu-min, Liu Bin, Jiao Yong-qian, Dong Gui-xian, Li Yu, Shang Hong-tao, Zhang Ning, Wang Quan, Li Ming-yan
The 2nd Department of Trauma, Orthopaedics and Trauma Center of Wangjing Hospital Affiliated to China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2011 Mar;24(3):208-11.
To compare clinical effects of clavicular hook plate fixation, coracoid transplantation, and clavicular hook plate fixation combined with modified dynamic muscle transfer for the treatment of the complete acromioclavicular dislocation.
From January 2006 to November 2009, 65 patients with sustained complete acrominoclavicular dislocation were treated with clavicular hook plate fixation, coracoid transplantation,and clavicular hook plate fixation combined with modified dynamic muscle transfer. All the patients were divided into three groups: 22 patients in group A were treated with clavicular hook plate fixation, including 17 males and 5 females, with an average age of (31.0 +/- 10.0) years; 21 patient in group B were treated with coracoid transplantation, including 16 males and 5 females,with an average age of (33.0 +/- 6.4) years; 22 patients in group C were treated with clavicular hook plate fixation combined with modified dynamic muscle transfer,including 18 males and 4 females, with an average age of (30.0 +/- 5.3) years. Postoperative functional recovery was evaluated by Karlsson criteria.
All the patients were followed up, and the duration ranged from half to three years (averaged 1.5 years). In group A, 8 patients got half re-dislocation, 2 patients got complete re-dislocation and arthritis of acromioclavicular joint after internal fixations removal, 1 patient had clavicular hook plate broken after operation. In group B, 7 patients got half re-dislocation, 1 patient got complete re-dislocation,and 5 patients had arthritis of acromioclavicular joint with acute pain and limited shoulder function after internal fixations removal. In group C,2 patients got half re-dislocation, no complete re-dislocation and arthritis of acromioclavicular joint occurred after internal fixations removal. According to Karlsson evaluation, in group A, 12 patients obtained an excellent result, 8 good and 2 poor; in group B, the data were 9, 7 and 5 respectively; in group C, they were 20, 2 and 0 respectively. There were remarkable differences of therapeutic effects between the clavicular hook plate fixation combined with modified dynamic muscle transfer and that with either of the former two treatment methods (P < 0.05).
Clavicular hook plate combined with modified dynamic muscle transfer is a reliable and good treatment for the complete acrominoclavicular dislocation, with advantages such as easy to handle,stable fixation and early exercise.
比较锁骨钩钢板固定、喙突移植以及锁骨钩钢板固定联合改良动力肌转移治疗完全性肩锁关节脱位的临床效果。
2006年1月至2009年11月,65例持续性完全性肩锁关节脱位患者分别接受锁骨钩钢板固定、喙突移植以及锁骨钩钢板固定联合改良动力肌转移治疗。所有患者分为三组:A组22例,采用锁骨钩钢板固定,其中男17例,女5例,平均年龄(31.0±10.0)岁;B组21例,采用喙突移植,其中男16例,女5例,平均年龄(33.0±6.4)岁;C组22例,采用锁骨钩钢板固定联合改良动力肌转移,其中男18例,女4例,平均年龄(30.0±5.3)岁。术后采用Karlsson标准评估功能恢复情况。
所有患者均获随访,随访时间半年至3年(平均1.5年)。A组8例出现半脱位,2例在取出内固定后出现完全性再脱位及肩锁关节关节炎,1例术后出现锁骨钩钢板断裂。B组7例出现半脱位,1例出现完全性再脱位,5例在取出内固定后出现肩锁关节关节炎伴急性疼痛及肩关节功能受限。C组2例出现半脱位,取出内固定后未出现完全性再脱位及肩锁关节关节炎。根据Karlsson评估,A组优12例、良8例、差2例;B组分别为9例、7例、5例;C组分别为20例、2例、0例。锁骨钩钢板固定联合改良动力肌转移与前两种治疗方法中的任何一种相比,治疗效果有显著差异(P<0.05)。
锁骨钩钢板联合改良动力肌转移是治疗完全性肩锁关节脱位的一种可靠且良好的方法,具有操作简便、固定稳定、可早期锻炼等优点。