Meyers Neuropsychological Services, Mililani, HI, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Apr;25(3):477-87. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2011.554442.
The current study examines the differences in neuropsychological test performance between individuals who were referred for evaluation by either plaintiff or defense attorneys. Comparisons were made using a standardized battery of tests, with the same tests being administered to both groups of individuals along with the MMPI-2. The results of the study showed no significant difference in domain-level performance, or on the psychological measures administered for plaintiff vs defense referrals who passed symptom validity tests (SVTs). Similarly, although those failing SVTs produced markedly lower test performance and reported more psychological symptoms in comparison to those passing SVTs, there were no differences between plaintiff or defense referrals on test performance for those failing SVTs.
本研究考察了由原告或被告律师推荐进行评估的个体之间神经心理学测试表现的差异。使用标准化测试组合进行了比较,两组个体都接受了相同的测试以及 MMPI-2。研究结果显示,通过症状有效性测试 (SVTs) 的原告与被告推荐个体在领域水平表现或心理测量方面没有显著差异。同样,虽然那些未通过 SVTs 的个体的测试表现明显较低,并且报告的心理症状比通过 SVTs 的个体更多,但在未通过 SVTs 的个体的测试表现方面,原告或被告推荐个体之间没有差异。