College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, PR China.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12(20):5268-75. doi: 10.1039/b924586c.
Computational study has been conducted to gain insight into the relative reactivity of stable carbenes (1 and 2) and typical frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs, 3-6) in activating H(2) and CH(4). For the FLP H(2) activations, despite the quite different basicities of the Lewis base components, they have comparable reactivities. The unexpected relative reactivity can be attributed to the following two factors: (i) the vacant carbene C: p(π) orbital, which is important when carbene works alone but does not participate in the FLP activation; and (ii) the electrostatic interaction between the Lewis base center and the approaching H atom which plays an important role and can either favor or disfavor a reaction. These explanations are also applicable to methane activations. The study brings two messages to the experimentalists for constructing FLPs: (i) it is recommended to use P- and N-centered Lewis bases to construct FLPs for H(2) activation because using more reactive components does not benefit the activation; and (ii) the FLPs are less reactive in activating CH(4) than H(2). In addition, using more reactive carbenes as Lewis bases in FLPs does not necessarily benefit the methane activation.
已进行计算研究,以深入了解稳定卡宾(1 和 2)和典型受阻路易斯对(FLP,3-6)在活化 H(2)和 CH(4)方面的相对反应性。对于 FLP H(2)活化,尽管路易斯碱组分的碱性差异很大,但它们具有相当的反应性。这种出人意料的相对反应性可归因于以下两个因素:(i)空卡宾 C:p(π)轨道,当卡宾单独作用时很重要,但不参与 FLP 活化;(ii)路易斯碱中心与接近的 H 原子之间的静电相互作用,它起着重要的作用,可以促进或阻碍反应。这些解释也适用于甲烷的活化。该研究为实验人员构建 FLP 带来了两条信息:(i)建议使用 P 和 N 中心路易斯碱来构建用于 H(2)活化的 FLP,因为使用更具反应性的组分并不能使活化受益;(ii)FLP 对 CH(4)的活化反应性低于 H(2)。此外,在 FLP 中使用更具反应性的卡宾作为路易斯碱不一定有利于甲烷的活化。