• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型转移性结直肠癌药物基于价值的定价指数的制定。

The development of a value based pricing index for new drugs in metastatic colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jun;47(9):1299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.03.015. Epub 2011 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2011.03.015
PMID:21493060
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, prices for cancer drugs have been under downward pressure where several governments have mandated price cuts of branded products. A better alternative to government mandated price cuts would be to estimate a final price based on drug performance, cost effectiveness and a country's ability to pay. We developed a global pricing index for new cancer drugs in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that encompasses all of these attributes.

METHODS

A pharmacoeconomic model was developed to simulate mCRC patients receiving chemotherapy plus a 'new drug' that improves survival by 1.4, 3 and 6months, respectively. Cost and utility data were obtained from cancer centres and oncology nurses (n=112) in Canada, Spain, India, South Africa and Malaysia. Multivariable analysis was then used to develop the pricing index, which considers survival benefit, per capita GDP and income dispersion (as measured by the Gini coefficient) as predictor variables.

RESULTS

Higher survival benefits were associated with elevated drug prices, especially in higher income countries such as Canada. For Argentina with a per capita GDP of $15,000 and a Gini coefficient of 51, the index estimated that for a drug which provides a 4month survival benefit in mCRC, the value based price would be $US 630 per dose. In contrast, the same drug in a wealthier country like Norway (per capita GDP=$50,000) could command a price of $US 2,775 per dose.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of this index to estimate a price based on cost effectiveness and the wealth of a nation would be important for opening dialogue between the key stakeholders and a better alternative to government mandated price cuts.

摘要

背景

在全球范围内,癌症药物的价格一直面临下行压力,一些国家的政府已强制要求降低品牌药物的价格。政府强制降价的更好替代方案是根据药物疗效、成本效益和国家的支付能力来估算最终价格。我们开发了一种新的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者用癌症药物的全球定价指数,该指数涵盖了所有这些属性。

方法

我们开发了一种药物经济学模型,用于模拟接受化疗加“新药”治疗的 mCRC 患者,分别将生存时间提高 1.4、3 和 6 个月。成本和效用数据来自加拿大、西班牙、印度、南非和马来西亚的癌症中心和肿瘤护士(n=112)。然后使用多变量分析来开发定价指数,该指数考虑了生存获益、人均 GDP 和收入分配(以基尼系数衡量)作为预测变量。

结果

较高的生存获益与较高的药物价格相关,特别是在加拿大等高收入国家。对于人均 GDP 为 15,000 美元且基尼系数为 51 的阿根廷,指数估计对于在 mCRC 中提供 4 个月生存获益的药物,基于价值的价格将为每剂 630 美元。相比之下,在挪威等更富裕的国家(人均 GDP 为 50,000 美元),相同的药物价格可能高达每剂 2775 美元。

结论

将该指数应用于根据成本效益和国家财富估算价格对于在主要利益相关者之间开展对话以及作为政府强制降价的更好替代方案非常重要。

相似文献

1
The development of a value based pricing index for new drugs in metastatic colorectal cancer.新型转移性结直肠癌药物基于价值的定价指数的制定。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jun;47(9):1299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.03.015. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
2
A pharmacoeconomic modeling approach to estimate a value-based price for new oncology drugs in Europe.一种用于估算欧洲新型肿瘤药物基于价值的价格的药物经济学建模方法。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2012 Mar;18(1):57-67. doi: 10.1177/1078155210390724. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
3
The application of pharmacoeconomic modelling to estimate a value-based price for new cancer drugs.药物经济学模型在估算新型癌症药物基于价值的价格中的应用。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):343-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01565.x. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
4
Drug pricing and value in oncology.肿瘤学中的药物定价和价值。
Oncologist. 2010;15 Suppl 1:24-31. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-S1-24.
5
[Risk sharing methods in middle income countries].[中等收入国家的风险分担方法]
Acta Pharm Hung. 2012;82(1):43-52.
6
Continental Divide? The attitudes of US and Canadian oncologists on the costs, cost-effectiveness, and health policies associated with new cancer drugs.大陆分水岭?美国和加拿大肿瘤学家对新癌症药物相关成本、成本效益和卫生政策的态度。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 20;28(27):4149-53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.1625. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
7
Improving patient access to cancer drugs in India: Using economic modeling to estimate a more affordable drug cost based on measures of societal value.提高印度癌症患者获得药物的机会:利用经济模型根据社会价值衡量标准来估算更可负担得起的药物成本。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Jan;27(1):23-30. doi: 10.1017/S026646231000125X.
8
The value of new chemotherapeutic agents for metastatic colorectal cancer.新型化疗药物对转移性结直肠癌的价值。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Mar 22;170(6):537-42. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.36. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
9
[Assessment of the cost of first line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Preliminary results in the FFCD 9601 trial].[转移性结直肠癌一线化疗费用评估。FFCD 9601试验的初步结果]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2001 Aug-Sep;25(8-9):749-54.
10
European perspective on the costs and cost-effectiveness of cancer therapies.欧洲对癌症治疗成本及成本效益的看法。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jan 10;25(2):191-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.8956.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive taxonomy and worldwide trends in pharmaceutical policies in relation to country income status.与国家收入状况相关的制药政策的综合分类及全球趋势。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 25;17(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2304-2.