Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定在小儿气道重建中的应用。

Dexmedetomidine use in pediatric airway reconstruction.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, and Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Feb;144(2):262-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599810391397. Epub 2010 Dec 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assess the postoperative use of dexmedetomidine (Precedex) in pediatric patients following airway reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Historical cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary medical center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 24 children undergoing laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) or laryngeal cleft repair (LCR) was conducted. Twelve children were treated with standard sedation protocols where dexmedetomidine was administered in lieu of propofol (Diprivan); 12 age-, gender-, and procedure-matched controls were selected. Subjects were divided into groups based on duration of postoperative intubation for cross-comparison; group 1 was intubated <24 hours, group 2 was intubated 2 to 6 days, and group 3 was intubated 7 days or longer. Baseline heart rate and blood pressure measurements were compared to hourly measurements for the first 6 hours following initiation of dexmedetomidine or mechanical ventilation in the control group. Number of supportive respiratory interventions, adverse events, self-extubations, premature termination of dexmedetomidine, amount of muscle relaxants, agents to treat withdrawal, and length of stay were evaluated.

RESULTS

Ten patients undergoing LTR and 2 patients undergoing LCR receiving dexmedetomidine were compared to 10 LTR and 2 LCR control patients. Overall, dexmedetomidine was well tolerated and without significant adverse effects, particularly in cases of short-term intubation or as a bridge to extubation.

CONCLUSION

In cases requiring short-term intubation following airway reconstruction, dexmedetomidine may offer a safe alternative to propofol by providing readily reversible sedation during the periextubation period. Further studies are needed to determine the safety, efficacy, dosing, and potential complications of longer term dexmedetomidine administration in pediatric airway reconstruction.

摘要

目的

评估小儿气道重建术后使用右美托咪定(Precedex)的情况。

研究设计

历史队列研究。

地点

三级医疗中心。

研究对象和方法

对 24 例行喉气管重建(LTR)或喉裂修复(LCR)的儿童进行回顾性研究。12 例患儿采用标准镇静方案治疗,其中右美托咪定替代丙泊酚(Diprivan);选择 12 例年龄、性别和手术相匹配的对照组。根据术后插管时间将患者分为组进行交叉比较:组 1 插管时间<24 小时,组 2 插管时间 2-6 天,组 3 插管时间 7 天或更长。比较右美托咪定或对照组机械通气开始后前 6 小时的基础心率和血压测量值与每小时测量值。评估支持性呼吸干预、不良事件、自行拔管、过早停止使用右美托咪定、肌松剂用量、戒断治疗药物以及住院时间。

结果

10 例 LTR 患儿和 2 例 LCR 患儿接受右美托咪定治疗,与 10 例 LTR 患儿和 2 例 LCR 对照组患儿进行比较。总体而言,右美托咪定耐受良好,无明显不良反应,特别是在短期插管或作为拔管桥接时。

结论

在气道重建后需要短期插管的情况下,右美托咪定可在围拔管期提供易于逆转的镇静作用,替代丙泊酚成为一种安全的选择。需要进一步研究以确定在小儿气道重建中使用右美托咪定的安全性、疗效、剂量和潜在并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验