National Stroke Research Institute, Florey Neuroscience Institutes, Heidelberg Heights 3081, Victoria, Australia.
Stroke. 2011 Jun;42(6):1673-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.601997. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
The benefits of chronic disease self-management programs for stroke survivors are uncertain because individuals with severe impairments have been excluded from previous research. We undertook a phase II randomized controlled trial to determine whether a self-management program designed for survivors (SSMP; 8 weeks) was safe and feasible compared to standard care (control) or a generic self-management program (generic; 6 weeks).
Stroke survivors were recruited from 7 South Australian hospitals via a letter or indirectly (eg, newspapers). Eligible participants were randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio of 50 per group. Primary outcomes were recruitment, participation, and participant safety. Secondary outcomes were positive and active engagement in life using the Health Education Impact Questionnaire and characteristics of quality of life and mood at 6 months from program completion.
Of 315 people screened, 149 were eligible and 143 were randomized (48 SSMP, 47 generic, 48 control); mean age was 69 years (SD, 11) and 59% were female. Demographic features were similar between groups and 41% had severe cognitive impairment; 57% accessed the interventions, with 52% SSMP and 38% generic completing >50% of sessions (P=0.18). Thirty-two participants reported adverse events (7 control, 12 generic, 13 SSMP; P=0.3; 34% severe); however, none was attributable to the interventions. Potential benefits for improved mood were found.
SSMP was safe and feasible. Benefits of the stroke-specific program over the generic program included greater participation and completion rates. An efficacy trial is warranted given the forecast growth in the stroke population and improved survival trends.
由于以往的研究排除了严重功能障碍的个体,因此慢性病自我管理计划对中风幸存者的益处尚不确定。我们进行了一项 II 期随机对照试验,以确定为幸存者设计的自我管理计划(SSMP;8 周)与标准护理(对照组)或通用自我管理计划(通用;6 周)相比是否安全可行。
通过信件或间接方式(例如报纸)从南澳大利亚的 7 家医院招募中风幸存者。符合条件的参与者以 1:1:1 的比例随机分为每组 50 人。主要结局是招募、参与和参与者安全。次要结局是使用健康教育影响问卷积极参与生活,以及从完成计划后的 6 个月的生活质量和情绪特征。
在筛查的 315 人中,有 149 人符合条件,有 143 人被随机分组(48 名 SSMP、47 名通用、48 名对照组);平均年龄为 69 岁(标准差,11),59%为女性。组间人口统计学特征相似,41%有严重认知障碍;57%的人接受了干预措施,其中 SSMP 组有 52%,通用组有 38%完成了>50%的课程(P=0.18)。32 名参与者报告了不良事件(7 名对照组、12 名通用组、13 名 SSMP 组;P=0.3;34%严重);但是,没有一个与干预措施有关。发现情绪改善的潜在益处。
SSMP 是安全且可行的。与通用计划相比,该特定于中风的计划的优势包括更高的参与率和完成率。鉴于中风患者人数的增长和生存率的提高,有必要进行疗效试验。