Suppr超能文献

实时超声引导锁骨下静脉置管与关键患者中的体表标志法:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation versus the landmark method in critical care patients: a prospective randomized study.

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, General State Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1607-12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318218a1ae.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Subclavian vein catheterization may cause various complications. We compared the real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation vs. the landmark method in critical care patients.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized study.

SETTING

Medical intensive care unit of a tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Four hundred sixty-three mechanically ventilated patients enrolled in a randomized controlled ISRCTN-registered trial (ISRCTN-61258470).

INTERVENTIONS

We compared the ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation (200 patients) vs. the landmark method (201 patients) using an infraclavicular needle insertion point in all cases. Catheterization was performed under nonemergency conditions in the intensive care unit. Randomization was performed by means of a computer-generated random-numbers table and patients were stratified with regard to age, gender, and body mass index.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

No significant differences in the presence of risk factors for difficult cannulation between the two groups of patients were recorded. Subclavian vein cannulation was achieved in 100% of patients in the ultrasound group as compared with 87.5% in the landmark one (p < .05). Average access time and number of attempts were significantly reduced in the ultrasound group of patients compared with the landmark group (p < .05). In the landmark group, artery puncture and hematoma occurred in 5.4% of patients, respectively, hemothorax in 4.4%, pneumothorax in 4.9%, brachial plexus injury in 2.9%, phrenic nerve injury in 1.5%, and cardiac tamponade in 0.5%, which were all increased compared with the ultrasound group (p < .05). Catheter misplacements did not differ between groups. In this study, the real-time ultrasound method was rated on a semiquantitative scale as technically difficult by the participating physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data suggested that ultrasound-guided cannulation of the subclavian vein in critical care patients is superior to the landmark method and should be the method of choice in these patients.

摘要

目的

锁骨下静脉置管可能会引起各种并发症。我们比较了实时超声引导下锁骨下静脉置管与在重症监护患者中的体表标志定位法。

设计

前瞻性随机研究。

设置

三级医疗中心的医疗重症监护病房。

患者

463 名接受机械通气的患者参与了一项随机对照 ISRCTN 注册试验(ISRCTN-61258470)。

干预

在所有情况下,我们都使用锁骨下经皮穿刺点比较了超声引导下锁骨下静脉置管(200 例)与体表标志定位法(201 例)。置管在重症监护病房的非紧急情况下进行。通过计算机生成的随机数表进行随机分组,并根据年龄、性别和体重指数对患者进行分层。

测量和主要结果

两组患者在置管困难的危险因素方面无显著差异。与体表标志定位组(87.5%)相比,超声组患者的锁骨下静脉置管成功率为 100%(p <.05)。与体表标志定位组相比,超声组患者的平均置管时间和尝试次数明显减少(p <.05)。在体表标志定位组,动脉穿刺和血肿分别发生在 5.4%和 4.4%的患者中,血胸、气胸、臂丛神经损伤、膈神经损伤和心脏压塞分别发生在 4.9%、4.9%、2.9%、1.5%和 0.5%的患者中,均高于超声组(p <.05)。两组患者的导管位置不当无差异。在这项研究中,参与的医生对实时超声法进行了半定量评分,认为该法技术难度较大。

结论

本研究数据表明,在重症监护患者中,实时超声引导下锁骨下静脉置管优于体表标志定位法,应作为这些患者的首选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验