Suppr超能文献

现代抗精神病药物时代之前及期间迟发性运动障碍的流行病学

Epidemiology of tardive dyskinesia before and during the era of modern antipsychotic drugs.

作者信息

Tarsy Daniel, Lungu Codrin, Baldessarini Ross J

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Handb Clin Neurol. 2011;100:601-16. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52014-2.00043-4.

Abstract

Late or tardive dyskinesias/dystonias (TD), contrary to expectation, have not disappeared with the use of expensive, modern antipsychotic drugs (APDs). Risk appears to be substantially lower than with older neuroleptics, and there is sparing of most acute movement disorders traditionally associated with APD treatment. However, risks of TD with modern APDs have been reduced much less than expected, by perhaps two- to threefold or even less, with substantial risks in the elderly. Major challenges in assessing prevalence or, preferably, incidence of TD arise from prolonged and erratic past exposure to various APDs, relatively recent use of modern APDs, and the occurrence of spontaneous movement disorders (about 5% and more in the elderly). TD risks associated with modern APDs may be similar to some older neuroleptics, especially those of low-moderate potency. Risperidone (and its active metabolite paliperidone), at high doses, may carry unusually high TD risk, whereas TD risk is low with clozapine, and perhaps quetiapine and aripiprazole. Optimistic expectations for the efficacy and neurological safety of modern APDs have encouraged their wide use in many conditions, sometimes off-label or in combinations, with little research support, increasing the chance of a higher prevalence of TD, especially at older ages. Measures to limit TD risk include: (1) critical, objective indications for APD use; (2) long-term use only for compelling or research-supported indications, primarily chronic psychotic illness that worsens when APD is slowly discontinued; (3) avoiding off-label indications; (4) using alternative treatments when APD treatment is elective, or early dyskinesia is identified; (5) using low but effective doses of single APDs, especially in the elderly; and (6) regular and specific examination for early TD.

摘要

迟发性运动障碍/肌张力障碍(TD)与预期相反,并未因使用昂贵的现代抗精神病药物(APD)而消失。其风险似乎远低于使用较老的抗精神病药物,并且传统上与APD治疗相关的大多数急性运动障碍也较少出现。然而,现代APD引发TD的风险降低程度远低于预期,可能仅降低了两到三倍甚至更少,老年人面临的风险依然很大。评估TD患病率(或者更理想的是发病率)面临的主要挑战源于过去长期且不规律地接触各种APD、现代APD使用时间相对较短,以及自发性运动障碍的发生(老年人中约为5%或更高)。与现代APD相关的TD风险可能与某些较老的抗精神病药物相似,尤其是那些中低效力的药物。高剂量的利培酮(及其活性代谢物帕利哌酮)可能具有异常高的TD风险,而氯氮平、可能还有喹硫平和阿立哌唑的TD风险较低。对现代APD疗效和神经安全性的乐观预期促使其在许多情况下被广泛使用,有时是超适应证使用或联合使用,且缺乏研究支持,这增加了TD患病率升高的可能性,尤其是在老年人中。限制TD风险的措施包括:(1)明确、客观的APD使用指征;(2)仅在有充分理由或有研究支持的指征下长期使用,主要是用于慢性精神病性疾病,当缓慢停用APD时病情会恶化;(3)避免超适应证使用;(4)当APD治疗为非必需或发现早期运动障碍时,使用替代治疗;(5)使用低剂量但有效的单一APD,尤其是在老年人中;(6)定期进行专门检查以早期发现TD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验