Santa Monica and Los Angeles, Calif.; Boston, Mass.; St. Louis, Mo.; and Ann Arbor, Mich. From RAND Health and Pardee RAND Graduate School, RAND Corporation; the Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; Body Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and Skincare Center; and the Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Sep;128(3):629-639. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821f9f23.
There are increasing concerns about a possible association between anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and breast implants. The authors conducted a structured expert consultation process to evaluate the evidence for the association, its clinical significance, and a potential biological model based on their interpretation of the published evidence.
A multidisciplinary panel of 10 experts was selected based on nominations from national specialty societies, academic department heads, and recognized researchers in the United States.
Panelists agreed that (1) there is a positive association between breast implants and ALCL development but likely underrecognition of the true number of cases; (2) a recurrent, clinically evident seroma occurring 6 months or more after breast implantation should be aspirated and sent for cytologic analysis; (3) anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative ALCL that develops around breast implants is a clinically indolent disease with a favorable prognosis that is distinct from systemic anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative ALCL; (4) management should consist of removal of the involved implant and capsule, which is likely to prevent recurrence, and evaluation for other sites of disease; and (5) adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy should not be offered to women with capsule-confined disease. Little agreement, however, was found regarding etiologic risk factors for implant-associated ALCL.
The authors' assessment yielded consistent results on a number of key issues regarding ALCL in women with breast implants, but substantial further research is needed to improve our understanding of the epidemiology, clinical aspects, and biology of this disease.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, V.
人们越来越担心间变性大细胞淋巴瘤(ALCL)与乳房植入物之间可能存在关联。作者通过结构化的专家咨询过程,评估了这种关联的证据、其临床意义以及基于对已发表证据的解释的潜在生物学模型。
根据美国国家专业学会、学术部门负责人和公认研究人员的提名,选择了由 10 名专家组成的多学科小组。
小组成员一致认为:(1)乳房植入物与 ALCL 发展之间存在正相关关系,但可能低估了实际病例数;(2)乳房植入 6 个月或更长时间后出现的反复、明显的临床浆液肿应抽吸并进行细胞学分析;(3)在乳房植入物周围发生的、间变性淋巴瘤激酶阴性的 ALCL 是一种临床惰性疾病,预后良好,与系统性间变性淋巴瘤激酶阴性 ALCL 不同;(4)治疗应包括切除受累的植入物和包膜,这可能防止疾病复发,并评估其他部位的疾病;(5)对于包膜内疾病的女性,不应提供辅助放疗或化疗。然而,对于与植入物相关的 ALCL 的病因危险因素,小组意见分歧较大。
作者对乳房植入物的女性的 ALCL 的一些关键问题进行了评估,结果一致,但需要进一步进行大量研究,以提高我们对这种疾病的流行病学、临床方面和生物学的认识。
临床问题/证据水平:风险,V。