Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Aug;40(8):834-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.02.032. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
This prospective study evaluated the role of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the treatment of patients with impacted mandibular third molars at increased risk of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. Subjects with an increased risk of IAN injury, as diagnosed on panoramic radiographs, were enrolled in this study and underwent additional CBCT imaging. Two oral maxillofacial surgeons independently planned the surgical technique and estimated the risk of IAN injury on panoramic radiographs and on CBCT images. A test of symmetry and the McNemar test were executed to calculate the differences between the two imaging modalities. The study sample comprised 40 patients (mean age 27.6 years) presenting 53 mandibular third molars. Risk assessment for IAN injury based on panoramic radiography compared with CBCT imaging differed significantly (P<0.005). After reviewing the CBCT images, significantly more subjects were reclassified to a lower risk for IAN injury compared with the panoramic radiograph assessments. This change in risk assessment also resulted in a significantly different surgical approach (P<0.03). The results of this study show that CBCT contributes to optimal risk assessment and, as a consequence, to more adequate surgical planning, compared with panoramic radiography.
本前瞻性研究评估了锥形束 CT(CBCT)在治疗下颌第三磨牙阻生且易损伤下牙槽神经(IAN)的患者中的作用。本研究纳入了经全景片诊断为 IAN 损伤风险增加的患者,并进行了额外的 CBCT 成像。两位口腔颌面外科医生分别在全景片和 CBCT 图像上独立规划手术技术并评估 IAN 损伤的风险。采用对称性检验和 McNemar 检验来计算两种成像方式之间的差异。本研究样本包括 40 名患者(平均年龄 27.6 岁),共 53 颗下颌第三磨牙。基于全景片的 IAN 损伤风险评估与 CBCT 成像的评估结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.005)。与全景片评估相比,在查看 CBCT 图像后,更多的患者被重新归类为 IAN 损伤风险较低。这种风险评估的改变也导致了手术方法的显著差异(P<0.03)。本研究结果表明,与全景片相比,CBCT 有助于进行最佳的风险评估,并因此进行更适当的手术规划。