British Columbia Cancer Agency, Department of Radiation Oncology, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e561-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.021. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
(1) To examine the effect of surgical margin status on local recurrence (LR) and survival following breast-conserving therapy; (2) To identify subsets with close or positive margins with high LR risk despite whole breast radiotherapy (RT) plus boost.
Subjects were 2,264 women with pT1-3, any N, M0 invasive breast cancer, treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole breast ± boost RT. Five-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) LR, breast cancer-specific and overall survival (BCSS and OS) were compared between cohorts with negative (n = 1,980), close (n = 222), and positive (n = 62) margins. LR rates were analyzed according to clinicopathologic characteristics. Multivariable Cox regression modeling and matched analysis of close/positive margin cases and negative margin controls were performed.
Median follow-up was 5.2 years. Boost RT was used in 92% of patients with close or positive margins. Five-year KM LR rates in the negative, close and positive margin cohorts were 1.3%, 4.0%, and 5.2%, respectively (p = 0.001). BCSS and OS were similar in the three margin subgroups. In the close/positive margin cohort, LR rates were 10.2% with age <45 years, 11.8% with Grade III, 11.3% with lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and 26.3% with ≥4 positive nodes. Corresponding rates in the negative margin cohort were 2.3%, 2.4%, 1.0%, and 2.4%, respectively. On Cox regression analysis of the entire cohort, close or positive margin, Grade III histology, ≥4 positive nodes, and lack of systemic therapy were significantly associated with higher LR risk. When close/positive margin cases were matched to negative margin controls, the difference in 5-year LR remained significant (4.25% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.001).
On univariable analysis, subsets with close or positive margins, in combination with age <45 years, Grade III, LVI, and ≥4 positive nodes, have 5-year LR >10% despite whole breast plus boost RT. These patients should be considered for more definitive surgery.
(1)探讨保乳治疗后手术切缘状态对局部复发(LR)和生存的影响;(2)确定尽管接受全乳放疗(RT)加加量放疗,但仍存在切缘接近或阳性且 LR 风险较高的亚组。
本研究纳入了 2264 名 pT1-3、任何 N、M0 浸润性乳腺癌患者,接受保乳手术和全乳±加量 RT 治疗。比较切缘阴性(n = 1980)、切缘接近(n = 222)和切缘阳性(n = 62)患者的 5 年 Kaplan-Meier(KM)LR、乳腺癌特异性和总生存(BCSS 和 OS)。根据临床病理特征分析 LR 率。采用多变量 Cox 回归模型和切缘接近/阳性组与切缘阴性组的匹配分析。
中位随访时间为 5.2 年。92%的切缘接近或阳性患者接受了加量放疗。阴性、切缘接近和切缘阳性队列的 5 年 KM LR 率分别为 1.3%、4.0%和 5.2%(p = 0.001)。三个切缘亚组的 BCSS 和 OS 相似。在切缘接近/阳性亚组中,年龄<45 岁、组织学分级 III 级、淋巴管血管侵犯(LVI)、≥4 个阳性淋巴结患者的 LR 率分别为 10.2%、11.8%、11.3%和 26.3%。阴性切缘组的相应比率分别为 2.3%、2.4%、1.0%和 2.4%。对整个队列进行 Cox 回归分析显示,切缘接近/阳性、组织学分级 III 级、≥4 个阳性淋巴结和缺乏系统治疗与更高的 LR 风险显著相关。当切缘接近/阳性病例与阴性切缘对照组进行匹配时,5 年 LR 的差异仍具有统计学意义(4.25%比 0.7%,p < 0.001)。
单因素分析显示,切缘接近或阳性亚组,结合年龄<45 岁、组织学分级 III 级、LVI 和≥4 个阳性淋巴结,即使接受全乳加加量 RT,5 年 LR 仍>10%。这些患者应考虑更确定性手术。