Division of Endocrinology, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI Medical School, Dublin, Ireland.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011 Oct;75(4):505-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04074.x.
The optimal replacement regimen of hydrocortisone in adults with severe ACTH deficiency remains unknown. Management strategies vary from treatment with 15-30 mg or higher in daily divided doses, reflecting the paucity of prospective data on the adequacy of different glucocorticoid regimens.
Primarily to define the hydrocortisone regimen which results in a 24 h cortisol profile that most closely resembles that of healthy controls and secondarily to assess the impact on quality of life (QoL).
Ten male hypopituitary patients with severe ACTH deficiency (basal cortisol <100 nm and peak response to stimulation <400 nm) were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, crossover study of 3 hydrocortisone dose regimens. Following 6 weeks of each regimen patients underwent 24 h serum cortisol sampling and QoL assessment with the Short Form 36 (SF36) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaires. Free cortisol was calculated using Coolen's equation. All results were compared to those of healthy, matched controls.
Corticosteroid binding globulin (CBG) was significantly lower across all dose regimens compared to controls (P < 0·05). The lower dose regimen C (10 mg mane/5 mg tarde) produced a 24 h free cortisol profile (FCP) which most closely resembled that of controls. Both regimen A(20 mg mane/10 mg tarde) and B(10 mg mane/10 mg tarde) produced supraphysiological post-absorption peaks. There was no significant difference in QoL in patients between the three regimens, however energy level was significantly lower across all dose regimens compared to controls (P < 0·001).
The lower dose of hydrocortisone (10 mg/5 mg) produces a more physiological cortisol profile, without compromising QoL, compared to higher doses still used in clinical practice. This may have important implications in these patients, known to have excess cardiovascular mortality.
目前仍不清楚成人严重 ACTH 缺乏症患者氢化可的松的最佳替代治疗方案。治疗策略各不相同,从每日 15-30mg 或更高的剂量分次给药,这反映了缺乏不同糖皮质激素方案充分性的前瞻性数据。
主要是确定氢化可的松方案,使 24 小时皮质醇谱最接近健康对照,其次评估对生活质量(QoL)的影响。
10 名男性垂体功能减退症伴严重 ACTH 缺乏症(基础皮质醇<100nm,刺激后峰值<400nm)患者入组了一项前瞻性、随机、交叉研究,研究了 3 种氢化可的松剂量方案。在每个方案治疗 6 周后,患者接受了 24 小时血清皮质醇采样和生活质量评估,采用 36 项简短健康调查问卷(SF36)和诺丁汉健康调查问卷(NHP)。采用 Coolen 方程计算游离皮质醇。所有结果均与健康匹配对照进行比较。
所有剂量方案的皮质醇结合球蛋白(CBG)均明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。较低剂量方案 C(10mg 晨/5mg 晚)产生的 24 小时游离皮质醇谱(FCP)最接近对照组。方案 A(20mg 晨/10mg 晚)和 B(10mg 晨/10mg 晚)均产生了超生理吸收后峰值。三组方案之间患者的生活质量没有显著差异,但与对照组相比,所有剂量方案的能量水平均显著降低(P<0.001)。
与临床实践中仍在使用的较高剂量相比,较低剂量(10mg/5mg)的氢化可的松可产生更生理的皮质醇谱,而不影响生活质量。这可能对这些已知存在心血管死亡率过高的患者具有重要意义。