• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[本科医学生对学习档案袋认知调查问卷的编制与验证]

[Development and validation of a questionnaire on perception of portfolio by undergraduate medical students].

作者信息

Riquelme Arnoldo, Méndez Benjamín, de la Fuente Paloma, Padilla Oslando, Benaglio Carla, Sirhan Marisol, Labarca Jaime

机构信息

Departamento de Gastroenterología, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Rev Med Chil. 2011 Jan;139(1):45-53. Epub 2011 Apr 11.

PMID:21526316
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Portfolio is an innovative instrument that promotes reflection, creativity and professionalism among students.

AIM

To describe the development and validation process of a questionnaire to evaluate the use of portfolio in undergraduate medical students.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Focus groups with students and teachers were employed to identify aspects related with portfolio in undergraduate teaching. The Delphi technique was used to prioritize relevant aspects and construct the questionnaire. The validated questionnaire, consisting of 43 items and 6 factors, was applied to 97 students (response rote of 99.9%) in 2007 and 100 students (99.2%) in 2008. Each question had to be answered using a Likert scale, from 0 (completely disagree) to 4 (completely agree) The validity and reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated.

RESULTS

The questionnaire showed a high reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.9). The mean total scores obtained in 2007 and 2008 were 106.2 ± 21.2 (61.7% of the maximal obtainable score) and 104.6 ± 34.0 (60.8% of the maximal obtainable score), respectively No significant differences were seen in the analysis by factors. Changes in portfolio during 2008 showed differences in items related with organization, evaluation and regulation.

CONCLUSIONS

The questionnaire is a valid and highly reliable instrument, measuring perceptions about the portfolio by undergraduate medical students. The students perceived an improvement in their creativity and professionalism as one of the strengths of portfolio. The weaknesses identified during the implementation process helped us to focus changes in organization and evaluation to improve the portfolio as a dynamic process.

摘要

背景

学习档案袋是一种促进学生反思、创造力和专业素养的创新工具。

目的

描述一份用于评估本科医学生学习档案袋使用情况的问卷的开发和验证过程。

材料与方法

通过与学生和教师进行焦点小组讨论,以确定本科教学中与学习档案袋相关的方面。采用德尔菲技术对相关方面进行优先级排序并构建问卷。经过验证的问卷由43个项目和6个因素组成,于2007年应用于97名学生(回复率为99.9%),2008年应用于100名学生(99.2%)。每个问题必须使用李克特量表回答,从0(完全不同意)到4(完全同意),并对问卷的有效性和可靠性进行评估。

结果

该问卷显示出高可靠性(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.9)。2007年和2008年获得的平均总分分别为106.2 ± 21.2(最大可获得分数的61.7%)和104.6 ± 34.0(最大可获得分数的60.8%),各因素分析中未发现显著差异。2008年学习档案袋的变化显示出与组织、评估和管理相关项目的差异。

结论

该问卷是一种有效且高度可靠的工具,用于测量本科医学生对学习档案袋的看法。学生们认为学习档案袋的优势之一是他们的创造力和专业素养得到了提高。实施过程中发现的弱点帮助我们将组织和评估方面的改进重点放在学习档案袋上,使其成为一个动态过程。

相似文献

1
[Development and validation of a questionnaire on perception of portfolio by undergraduate medical students].[本科医学生对学习档案袋认知调查问卷的编制与验证]
Rev Med Chil. 2011 Jan;139(1):45-53. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
2
Measuring students' perceptions of the educational climate of the new curriculum at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile: performance of the Spanish translation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM).评估智利天主教大学学生对新课程教育氛围的看法:邓迪预备教育环境量表(DREEM)西班牙语翻译的表现。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2009 May;22(1):112. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
3
Validation of a method for measuring medical students' critical reflections on professionalism in gross anatomy.验证一种测量医学生对大体解剖学专业精神的批判性反思的方法。
Anat Sci Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;6(4):232-8. doi: 10.1002/ase.1329. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
4
Development and validation of questionnaire measuring attitudes towards sexual health among university students.大学生性健康态度调查问卷的编制与验证
Croat Med J. 2005 Feb;46(1):52-7.
5
Professionalism in medical education: the development and validation of a survey instrument to assess attitudes toward professionalism.医学教育中的职业素养:一种用于评估对职业素养态度的调查工具的开发与验证
Med Teach. 2007 Mar;29(2-3):e58-62. doi: 10.1080/01421590601044984.
6
Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education.本科医学教育中成功反思性使用档案袋的条件。
Med Educ. 2005 Dec;39(12):1230-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02337.x.
7
Assessing student reflection in medical practice. The development of an observer-rated instrument: reliability, validity and initial experiences.评估医学生在临床实践中的反思。一种观察者评分工具的开发:信度、效度及初步经验。
Med Educ. 2004 Apr;38(4):368-77. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01787.x.
8
Web- or paper-based portfolios: is there a difference?基于网络或纸质的档案袋:有区别吗?
Med Educ. 2007 Nov;41(11):1067-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02859.x.
9
Development of a student rating scale to evaluate teachers' competencies for facilitating reflective learning.开发学生评价量表以评估教师促进反思性学习的能力。
Med Educ. 2011 Feb;45(2):155-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03774.x.
10
"Safe Harbor": evaluation of a professionalism case discussion intervention for the gross anatomy course.“避风港”:大体解剖课程中专业精神案例讨论干预的评估。
Anat Sci Educ. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):191-8. doi: 10.1002/ase.1395. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
E-Portfolio as an Evaluative Tool for Emergency Virtual Education: Analysis of the Case of the University Andres Bello (Chile) During the COVID-19 Pandemic.电子档案袋作为应急虚拟教育的评估工具:对COVID-19大流行期间智利安德烈斯·贝略大学案例的分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 17;13:892278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892278. eCollection 2022.