Suppr超能文献

青少年可复性盘前移位伴间歇性绞锁的危险因素

Risk factors for anterior disc displacement with reduction and intermittent locking in adolescents.

作者信息

Kalaykova Stanimira I, Lobbezoo Frank, Naeije Machiel

机构信息

Department of Oral Kinesiology, Academic Center for Dentistry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Orofac Pain. 2011 Spring;25(2):153-60.

Abstract

AIMS

To test the hypothesis that oral parafunctions and symptomatic temporomandibulair joint (TMJ) hypermobility are risk factors in adolescents for both anterior disc displacement with reduction (ADDR) and intermittent locking.

METHODS

Participants were two hundred sixty 12- to 16-year-old adolescents (52.3% female) visiting a university clinic for regular dental care. ADDR and symptomatic TMJ hypermobility were diagnosed using a structured clinical examination. During the anamnesis, reports of intermittent locking and of several parafunctions were noted, eg, nocturnal tooth grinding, diurnal jaw clenching, gum chewing, nail biting, lip and/or cheek biting, and biting on objects. The adolescents' dentitions were examined for opposing matching tooth-wear facets as signs of tooth grinding. Risk factors for ADDR and intermittent locking were first assessed using univariate logistic regression and then entered into a stepwise backward multiple model.

RESULTS

While in the multiple model, ADDR was weakly associated only with increasing age (P = .02, explained variance 8.1%), intermittent locking was weakly correlated to diurnal jaw clenching (P = .05, explained variance 27.3%).

CONCLUSION

In adolescence, diurnal clenching may be a risk factor for intermittent locking while age may be a risk factor for ADDR. Symptomatic TMJ hypermobility seems to be unrelated to either ADDR or to intermittent locking.

摘要

目的

检验如下假设,即口腔副功能及有症状的颞下颌关节(TMJ)活动度过高是青少年发生可复性盘前移位(ADDR)和间歇性绞锁的危险因素。

方法

研究对象为260名12至16岁的青少年(女性占52.3%),他们前往大学诊所接受常规牙科护理。通过结构化临床检查诊断ADDR和有症状的TMJ活动度过高。在问诊期间,记录间歇性绞锁及几种副功能的情况,如夜磨牙、日间紧咬牙、嚼口香糖、咬指甲、咬唇和/或咬颊以及咬物。检查青少年的牙列,查看有无相对应的匹配性牙齿磨耗小平面,作为磨牙的体征。首先使用单因素逻辑回归评估ADDR和间歇性绞锁的危险因素,然后将其纳入逐步向后多模型。

结果

在多模型中,ADDR仅与年龄增长弱相关(P = .02,解释方差8.1%),而间歇性绞锁与日间紧咬牙弱相关(P = .05,解释方差27.3%)。

结论

在青少年中,日间紧咬牙可能是间歇性绞锁的危险因素,而年龄可能是ADDR的危险因素。有症状的TMJ活动度过高似乎与ADDR或间歇性绞锁均无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验