Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Curr Opin Urol. 2011 Jul;21(4):281-5. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283476eee.
More answers are nowadays available about certain aspects of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) treatment. In this overview some of those aspects are addressed that were considered important and published in 2010.
When stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is present concomitant with POP the strategy is still to perform an additional procedure for SUI. If there is no SUI the tendency is only to correct the POP. With masked SUI no firm conclusions can be drawn.The studies that look at mesh for POP provide some careful conclusions. Absorbable biomeshes do not have many benefits over repairs without mesh in the long term. Nonresorbable mesh tends to give better results but also higher complication rates and should be applied with care.A last item is how to perform a sacrocolpopexy. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a well tolerated but time-consuming and difficult procedure to treat prolapse. Comparison with other conventional techniques is lacking. Robotic surgery has the potential of enhancing the widespread introduction of laparoscopic procedures.
With these findings a better evidence-based choice for surgical technique can be made with regards to POP with or without SUI, the kind of mesh to use and which sacrocolpopexy technique should be chosen.
目前对于盆腔器官脱垂(POP)治疗的某些方面有了更多的答案。在本篇综述中,我们将介绍一些在 2010 年被认为重要并发表的方面。
当压力性尿失禁(SUI)与 POP 同时存在时,策略仍然是针对 SUI 进行额外的手术。如果没有 SUI,那么倾向于仅纠正 POP。对于隐匿性 SUI,目前尚无确凿的结论。关于 POP 中使用网片的研究提供了一些谨慎的结论。可吸收生物网片在长期内并没有比无网片修复带来更多益处。不可吸收网片往往会产生更好的效果,但也会导致更高的并发症发生率,因此应谨慎使用。最后一个问题是如何进行骶骨阴道固定术。腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术是一种可耐受但耗时且困难的治疗脱垂的手术。缺乏与其他传统技术的比较。机器人手术有可能增强腹腔镜手术的广泛应用。
有了这些发现,对于有或没有 SUI 的 POP、使用哪种网片以及选择哪种骶骨阴道固定术技术,可以做出更好的基于证据的手术技术选择。