• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜碎石取石术一期通道扩张技术后肾实质损伤:一项随机临床试验。

Renal parenchymal damage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy with one-stage tract dilation technique: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2011 Jun;25(6):927-31. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0638. Epub 2011 May 4.

DOI:10.1089/end.2010.0638
PMID:21542774
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of one-stage vs gradual dilation techniques during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on postoperative renal scar formation and overall renal function.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 152 adult patients who underwent surgery during the study period, 48 were randomized into two groups. In group 1 (n=19), gradual tract dilation with Alken metallic dilators was used, and in group 2 (n=29), one-stage tract dilation was used. We compared patient demographics, intraoperative and preoperative parameters, postoperative overall renal function, and renal scar formation on the target renal pole.

RESULTS

Access time (P=0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.19-6.30) and radiation exposure during access (P=0.03; 95% CI: 0.03-0.66) were significantly shorter in group 2. In group 1, the decrease in mean technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (99m-Tc DMSA) uptake from 44.1±20.1% to 43.4±19.6% 4 weeks postoperatively (-0.7%±0.5%; P=0.27; 95% CI: -0.56-1.93) was not significant. In group 2, however, there was a significant decrease in post-PCNL 99m-Tc DMSA uptake 2 (-2.4±0.3%, from 50.1±13.5% to 47.7±13.8%; P=0.001; 95% CI: 1.13-3.66). Four weeks after surgery, new scar formation or progression of the preoperative scar at the site of access were seen in 14 of 29 (48.3%) patients who were treated with one-stage dilation whereas only 2 of 19 (11.0%) patients who were treated with gradual dilation developed new scarring at the access site (P=0.007).

CONCLUSION

Although the one-stage tract dilation technique reduced radiation exposure and access time, in the short term, it may cause more parenchymal damage than the gradual dilation technique.

摘要

目的

比较经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中一期扩张与逐渐扩张技术对术后肾瘢痕形成和整体肾功能的影响。

患者和方法

在研究期间接受手术的 152 例成年患者中,48 例随机分为两组。在组 1(n=19)中,使用 Alken 金属扩张器进行逐渐扩张,在组 2(n=29)中,使用一期扩张。我们比较了患者的人口统计学特征、术中及术前参数、术后整体肾功能以及目标肾极的肾瘢痕形成。

结果

组 2 的通道建立时间(P=0.001;95%置信区间[CI]:3.19-6.30)和通道建立期间的辐射暴露(P=0.03;95%CI:0.03-0.66)显著缩短。在组 1 中,术后 4 周时,锝-99m 二巯丁二酸(99m-Tc DMSA)摄取量从 44.1±20.1%降至 43.4±19.6%(-0.7%±0.5%;P=0.27;95%CI:-0.56-1.93),但无显著意义。然而,在组 2 中,PCNL 后 99m-Tc DMSA 摄取量明显下降 2(从 50.1±13.5%降至 47.7±13.8%;-2.4±0.3%;P=0.001;95%CI:1.13-3.66)。术后 4 周时,在接受一期扩张治疗的 29 例患者中,有 14 例(48.3%)出现新的瘢痕形成或术前瘢痕在通道部位进展,而在接受逐渐扩张治疗的 19 例患者中,只有 2 例(11.0%)出现通道部位新的瘢痕形成(P=0.007)。

结论

尽管一期通道扩张技术减少了辐射暴露和通道建立时间,但在短期内,它可能比逐渐扩张技术造成更多的实质损伤。

相似文献

1
Renal parenchymal damage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy with one-stage tract dilation technique: a randomized clinical trial.经皮肾镜碎石取石术一期通道扩张技术后肾实质损伤:一项随机临床试验。
J Endourol. 2011 Jun;25(6):927-31. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0638. Epub 2011 May 4.
2
Effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and tract dilatation methods on renal function: assessment by quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography of technetium-99m-dimercaptosuccinic acid uptake by the kidneys.经皮肾镜取石术和通道扩张方法对肾功能的影响:应用 99mTc-二巯丁二酸肾脏摄取的定量单光子发射计算机断层扫描评估。
J Endourol. 2010 Sep;24(9):1497-502. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0008.
3
Predictors of excessive renal displacement during access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized clinical trial.经皮肾镜取石术中穿刺时肾脏过度移位的预测因素:一项随机临床试验
Urolithiasis. 2014 Feb;42(1):61-5. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0600-9. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
4
A comparison of metal telescopic dilators and Amplatz dilators for nephrostomy tract dilation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜碎石取石术中金属伸缩扩张器与 Amplatz 扩张器扩张经皮肾造瘘通道的比较。
J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):630-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0291. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
5
One-stage tract dilation for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it justified?经皮肾镜取石术的一期通道扩张:是否合理?
J Endourol. 2007 Dec;21(12):1415-20. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0454.
6
Does percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children cause significant renal scarring?儿童经皮肾镜取石术会导致明显的肾瘢痕形成吗?
J Pediatr Urol. 2007 Feb;3(1):36-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.02.001. Epub 2006 Apr 5.
7
Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5,537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study.经皮肾镜取石术的手术时间和出血并发症:临床研究办公室的欧洲泌尿外科学会经皮肾镜取石术全球研究中 5537 例患者的通道扩张方法比较。
J Endourol. 2011 Jun;25(6):933-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0606. Epub 2011 May 13.
8
The safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of large renal stones in single- versus double-functioning kidney patients.经皮肾镜取石术治疗单功能与双功能肾患者大肾结石的安全性和有效性。
J Endourol. 2012 Mar;26(3):235-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0083. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
9
Nephrostomy tract dilation using a balloon dilator in percutaneous renal surgery: experience with 95 cases and comparison with the fascial dilator system.经皮肾手术中使用球囊扩张器进行肾造瘘通道扩张:95例经验及与筋膜扩张器系统的比较
Urol Int. 2003;71(4):382-4. doi: 10.1159/000074090.
10
One-shot versus metal telescopic dilation technique for tract creation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of safety and efficacy.经皮肾镜取石术中用于建立通道的单次扩张与金属伸缩式扩张技术:安全性和有效性的比较
J Endourol. 2009 Apr;23(4):615-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0330.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of methylene blue-assisted tract visualization in ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a salvage technique for failed renal access.亚甲蓝辅助通道显影在超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中的疗效:一种挽救失败肾穿刺通道的技术
Urolithiasis. 2025 Mar 23;53(1):55. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01728-x.
2
What is the safe and effective dilator number during access in PCNL? Three-shot dilation versus classical sequential Amplatz dilation.经皮肾镜取石术中安全有效的扩张器数量是多少?三枪扩张与经典序贯 Amplatz 扩张比较。
BMC Urol. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01368-6.
3
Endoscopic dilation using two guidewires: a novel approach for establishing access tract during percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonographic guidance.
超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中使用两根导丝进行内镜扩张:一种建立通道的新方法。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Nov;51(11):3000605231213228. doi: 10.1177/03000605231213228.
4
The feasibility and safety of one-shot dilatation compared to conventional sequential dilatation in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.经皮肾镜碎石取石术中单次扩张与传统序贯扩张的可行性和安全性比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Dec 1;51(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01383-6.
5
Single step track dilatation for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.经皮肾镜取石术中的单步轨道扩张。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Nov;54(11):2789-2795. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03314-1. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
6
The safety and efficiency of a 1470 nm laser in obtaining tract hemostasis in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective cross-sectional study.1470nm 激光在无管经皮肾镜取石术中获得通道止血的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性横断面研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Jul 2;22(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01046-z.
7
A novel approach in creating nephrostomy using a double-lumen access sheath during endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery.在内镜联合肾内手术中使用双腔接入鞘创建肾造瘘术的一种新方法。
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Nov;10(11):4181-4191. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-611.
8
Does previous standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy impair retrograde intrarenal surgery outcomes?既往标准经皮肾镜碎石术是否会影响逆行性肾内手术的结局?
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Nov-Dec;47(6):1198-1206. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0253.
9
Balloon versus Amplatz for tract dilation in fluoroscopically guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.球囊扩张与 Amplatz 扩张器在透视引导下经皮肾镜取石术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 12;10(7):e035943. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035943.
10
Effectiveness and safety of four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A meta-analysis.经皮肾镜取石术四种通道扩张方法的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Apr;19(4):2661-2671. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8486. Epub 2020 Feb 4.