Suppr超能文献

高剂量率近距离放射治疗作为低危前列腺癌的单一疗法:一项 II 期试验。

High-dose-rate brachytherapy as a monotherapy for favorable-risk prostate cancer: a Phase II trial.

机构信息

Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):1889-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.006. Epub 2011 May 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There are multiple treatment options for favorable-risk prostate cancer. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as a monotherapy is appealing, but its use is still investigational. A Phase II trial was undertaken to explore the value of such treatment in low-to-intermediate risk prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This was a single-institution, prospective study. Eligible patients had low-risk prostate cancer features but also Gleason scores of 7 (51% of patients) and stage T2b to T2c cancer. Treatment with HDR brachytherapy with a single implant was administered over 2 days. One of four fractionation schedules was used in a dose escalation study design: 3 fractions of 10, 10.5, 11, or 11.5 Gy. Patients were assessed with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 2.0 for urinary toxicity, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring schema for rectal toxicity, and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire to measure patient-reported health-related quality of life. Biochemical failure was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir plus 2 ng/ml.

RESULTS

Between 2003 and 2008, 79 patients were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 39.5 months, biochemical relapse occurred in 7 patients. Three- and 5-year actuarial biochemical control rates were 88.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.0-96.2%) and 85.1% (95% CI, 72.5-94.5%), respectively. Acute grade 3 urinary toxicity was seen in only 1 patient. There was no instance of acute grade 3 rectal toxicity. Rates of late grade 3 rectal toxicity, dysuria, hematuria, urinary retention, and urinary incontinence were 0%, 10.3%, 1.3%, 9.0%, and 0%, respectively. No grade 4 or greater toxicity was recorded. Among the four (urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal) domains assessed with the EPIC questionnaire, only the sexual domain did not recover with time.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR brachytherapy as a monotherapy for favorable-risk prostate cancer, administered using a single implant over 2 days, is feasible and has acceptable acute and late toxicities. Further follow-up is still required to better evaluate the efficacy of such treatment.

摘要

目的

对于低危前列腺癌有多种治疗选择。高剂量率(HDR)近距离放疗作为单一疗法具有吸引力,但仍处于研究阶段。进行了一项 II 期试验,以探讨这种治疗方法在中低危前列腺癌中的价值。

方法和材料

这是一项单机构前瞻性研究。符合条件的患者具有低危前列腺癌的特征,但也有 Gleason 评分 7(51%的患者)和 T2b 至 T2c 期癌症。使用 HDR 近距离放疗,单次植入,分两天进行。采用剂量递增设计的四种分割方案之一:10、10.5、11 或 11.5 Gy 的 3 个分数。采用通用不良事件术语标准 2.0 版评估尿毒性、放射治疗肿瘤学组/欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织评分方案评估直肠毒性、以及扩展前列腺癌指数综合量表(EPIC)问卷评估患者报告的健康相关生活质量。生化失败定义为前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)最低点加 2 ng/ml。

结果

2003 年至 2008 年间,共纳入 79 例患者。中位随访 39.5 个月后,7 例患者发生生化复发。3 年和 5 年生化无复发生存率分别为 88.4%(95%置信区间 [CI],78.0-96.2%)和 85.1%(95% CI,72.5-94.5%)。仅 1 例出现急性 3 级尿毒性。无急性 3 级直肠毒性。晚期 3 级直肠毒性、排尿困难、血尿、尿潴留和尿失禁的发生率分别为 0%、10.3%、1.3%、9.0%和 0%。未记录到 4 级或更高级别的毒性。在 EPIC 问卷评估的四个(尿、肠、性和激素)域中,只有性域没有随时间恢复。

结论

HDR 近距离放疗作为低危前列腺癌的单一疗法,使用单次植入物分两天进行,是可行的,且具有可接受的急性和晚期毒性。仍需进一步随访以更好地评估这种治疗的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验