Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):1889-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.006. Epub 2011 May 6.
There are multiple treatment options for favorable-risk prostate cancer. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as a monotherapy is appealing, but its use is still investigational. A Phase II trial was undertaken to explore the value of such treatment in low-to-intermediate risk prostate cancer.
This was a single-institution, prospective study. Eligible patients had low-risk prostate cancer features but also Gleason scores of 7 (51% of patients) and stage T2b to T2c cancer. Treatment with HDR brachytherapy with a single implant was administered over 2 days. One of four fractionation schedules was used in a dose escalation study design: 3 fractions of 10, 10.5, 11, or 11.5 Gy. Patients were assessed with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 2.0 for urinary toxicity, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring schema for rectal toxicity, and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire to measure patient-reported health-related quality of life. Biochemical failure was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir plus 2 ng/ml.
Between 2003 and 2008, 79 patients were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 39.5 months, biochemical relapse occurred in 7 patients. Three- and 5-year actuarial biochemical control rates were 88.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.0-96.2%) and 85.1% (95% CI, 72.5-94.5%), respectively. Acute grade 3 urinary toxicity was seen in only 1 patient. There was no instance of acute grade 3 rectal toxicity. Rates of late grade 3 rectal toxicity, dysuria, hematuria, urinary retention, and urinary incontinence were 0%, 10.3%, 1.3%, 9.0%, and 0%, respectively. No grade 4 or greater toxicity was recorded. Among the four (urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal) domains assessed with the EPIC questionnaire, only the sexual domain did not recover with time.
HDR brachytherapy as a monotherapy for favorable-risk prostate cancer, administered using a single implant over 2 days, is feasible and has acceptable acute and late toxicities. Further follow-up is still required to better evaluate the efficacy of such treatment.
对于低危前列腺癌有多种治疗选择。高剂量率(HDR)近距离放疗作为单一疗法具有吸引力,但仍处于研究阶段。进行了一项 II 期试验,以探讨这种治疗方法在中低危前列腺癌中的价值。
这是一项单机构前瞻性研究。符合条件的患者具有低危前列腺癌的特征,但也有 Gleason 评分 7(51%的患者)和 T2b 至 T2c 期癌症。使用 HDR 近距离放疗,单次植入,分两天进行。采用剂量递增设计的四种分割方案之一:10、10.5、11 或 11.5 Gy 的 3 个分数。采用通用不良事件术语标准 2.0 版评估尿毒性、放射治疗肿瘤学组/欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织评分方案评估直肠毒性、以及扩展前列腺癌指数综合量表(EPIC)问卷评估患者报告的健康相关生活质量。生化失败定义为前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)最低点加 2 ng/ml。
2003 年至 2008 年间,共纳入 79 例患者。中位随访 39.5 个月后,7 例患者发生生化复发。3 年和 5 年生化无复发生存率分别为 88.4%(95%置信区间 [CI],78.0-96.2%)和 85.1%(95% CI,72.5-94.5%)。仅 1 例出现急性 3 级尿毒性。无急性 3 级直肠毒性。晚期 3 级直肠毒性、排尿困难、血尿、尿潴留和尿失禁的发生率分别为 0%、10.3%、1.3%、9.0%和 0%。未记录到 4 级或更高级别的毒性。在 EPIC 问卷评估的四个(尿、肠、性和激素)域中,只有性域没有随时间恢复。
HDR 近距离放疗作为低危前列腺癌的单一疗法,使用单次植入物分两天进行,是可行的,且具有可接受的急性和晚期毒性。仍需进一步随访以更好地评估这种治疗的疗效。