Ratto G B, Frola C, Cantoni S, Motta G
Inst. of Clinica Chirurgica 1a, University of Genoa, Italy.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990 Mar;99(3):416-25.
The criterion of choice for computed tomographic scan identification of metastatic mediastinal nodes is not clearly fixed. This prospective study was designed to define the most suitable computed tomographic criterion for detection of nodal metastasis, enabling improvement of the test's clinical efficacy. One hundred twenty-three patients with potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer underwent mediastinal evaluation by computed tomographic scan and cervical mediastinoscopy followed by thoracotomy with mediastinal node dissection. There were 116 men and seven women; the mean age was 59.3 +/- 9.1 years. Forty-six tumors were classified after operation as stage I, 20 as stage II, 27 as stage IIIa, and 30 as stage IIIb. Mediastinal nodes were classified as metastatic according to the following computed tomographic scan criteria: (1) shorter axis 1 cm or larger; (2) shorter axis 1.5 cm or larger (nodes less than 1 cm were classified as negative and those 1 to 1.5 cm as indeterminate); and (3a) shorter axis 1 cm or larger, plus evidence of central necrosis or discontinued capsule, or (3b) shorter axis 2 cm or more, regardless of the nodal morphologic condition. The highest sensitivity rate was achieved by using criterion 1 (90%) and the poorest by criterion 3 (75%). The greatest specificity rate was obtained by applying criterion 3 (90%) and the lowest by criterion 1 (54%). The prediction by using computed tomographic criterion 3 correlated better with pathologic findings than that derived by adopting the criterion 1 or 2. When mediastinal nodes were identified as negative according to criterion 1, 2, or 3, the complete resection rate was 92%, 92%, or 95%, respectively, rendering cervical mediastinoscopy unnecessary. When mediastinal nodes were classified as positive, the resectability rate was 55%, 27%, or 13%, respectively. In these instances cervical mediastinoscopy allowed identification of different degrees of mediastinal involvement; it proved to be the most useful procedure for preoperative selection of those patients with N2 tumors who are amenable to a complete resection. In conclusion, the use of computed tomographic criterion 3 does improve the clinical efficacy of the test, by sparing a large number of unnecessary mediastinal explorations, without increasing the rate of useless thoracotomies.
计算机断层扫描识别纵隔转移淋巴结的选择标准尚未明确确定。这项前瞻性研究旨在确定检测淋巴结转移最合适的计算机断层扫描标准,以提高该检查的临床效能。123例可能可手术切除的非小细胞肺癌患者接受了计算机断层扫描和颈部纵隔镜检查进行纵隔评估,随后进行开胸纵隔淋巴结清扫术。其中男性116例,女性7例;平均年龄为59.3±9.1岁。术后46例肿瘤分类为Ⅰ期,20例为Ⅱ期,27例为Ⅲa期,30例为Ⅲb期。根据以下计算机断层扫描标准将纵隔淋巴结分类为转移:(1)短径≥1 cm;(2)短径≥1.5 cm(短径<1 cm的淋巴结分类为阴性,1~1.5 cm的为不确定);以及(3a)短径≥1 cm,加上中央坏死或包膜中断的证据,或(3b)短径≥2 cm,无论淋巴结形态如何。使用标准1时敏感性率最高(90%),使用标准3时最低(75%)。应用标准3时特异性率最高(90%),使用标准1时最低(54%)。使用计算机断层扫描标准3进行的预测与病理结果的相关性比采用标准1或2更好。当根据标准1、2或3将纵隔淋巴结判定为阴性时,完全切除率分别为92%、92%或95%,无需进行颈部纵隔镜检查。当纵隔淋巴结分类为阳性时,可切除率分别为55%、27%或13%。在这些情况下,颈部纵隔镜检查可确定不同程度的纵隔受累情况;事实证明,对于术前选择适合完全切除的N2期肿瘤患者,这是最有用的检查方法。总之,使用计算机断层扫描标准3确实提高了该检查的临床效能,通过避免大量不必要的纵隔探查,且不增加无意义的开胸手术率。