Suppr超能文献

骨科专家意见、证词以及作为被告的医生。

Orthopaedic expert opinion, testimony, and the physician as a defendant.

作者信息

Carroll Charles, Wellman David S

机构信息

Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Instr Course Lect. 2011;60:597-605.

Abstract

Medicolegal issues continue to challenge orthopaedic surgeons. Although health reform legislation has passed Congress, the first phase has not incorporated any significant changes regarding liability reform for practicing orthopaedic surgeons. Medical malpractice, personal injury, and workers' compensation litigation remains an issue for patients and physicians. Although orthopaedic surgeons can be defendants, it is more likely that they will be retained as treating physicians or experts as part of the litigation process. The involvement of a qualified physician as an expert witness is essential to the outcome of any litigation involving medical issues. As triers of the facts, the judge and jury members rely on quality medical testimony. Expert witness testimony can be a time-consuming process. A physician who assumes the role must be able to spend the time necessary to do a good job. A prepared expert witness can have a profound effect on litigation. A poorly prepared physician expert witness can be harmful to a case and risks the loss of prestige, honor among colleagues, and future work. Sanctions may be imposed by professional organizations. Most importantly, a physician working within the legal system must remain honest and tell nothing but the truth.

摘要

法医学问题持续困扰着骨科医生。尽管医疗改革立法已在国会通过,但第一阶段并未对执业骨科医生的责任改革做出任何重大改变。医疗事故、人身伤害和工伤赔偿诉讼对患者和医生来说仍是个问题。虽然骨科医生可能成为被告,但在诉讼过程中,他们更有可能作为主治医生或专家被聘请。合格的医生作为专家证人参与其中,对任何涉及医疗问题的诉讼结果至关重要。作为事实的裁决者,法官和陪审团成员依赖高质量的医学证词。专家证人作证可能是一个耗时的过程。承担这一角色的医生必须能够投入必要的时间把工作做好。准备充分的专家证人会对诉讼产生深远影响。准备不足的医生专家证人可能对案件有害,并有可能失去声誉、同行中的荣誉以及未来的工作机会。专业组织可能会实施制裁。最重要的是,在法律体系内工作的医生必须保持诚实,只讲真话。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验