Suppr超能文献

有耳鸣和无耳鸣的听力正常患者听觉电生理反应的比较。

Comparison of auditory electrophysiological responses in normal-hearing patients with and without tinnitus.

作者信息

Singh S, Munjal S K, Panda N K

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

J Laryngol Otol. 2011 Jul;125(7):668-72. doi: 10.1017/S0022215111000569. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Tinnitus is a disturbing symptom and is often the main reason for otology referral. It is usually associated with hearing loss of varying aetiology, and is thought to begin in the cochlea, with later abnormal central activity. We hypothesise that tinnitus without hearing loss may be caused by central and subcortical abnormalities and altered outer hair cell function.

AIM

To compare the auditory brainstem responses, middle latency responses and otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing individuals with and without tinnitus.

METHODOLOGY

The audiological test results of 25 normal hearing subjects with tinnitus (age 18-45 years) were determined, and compared with those of a control group.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was found between study group tinnitus ears vs control group ears, as regards wave I latency prolongation, shortening of wave V and absolute I-III and I-V interpeak latency, enlargement of wave Na and Pa amplitude, and distortion product and transient evoked otoacoustic emission signal-to-noise ratios. There was no statistically significant difference between unilateral vs bilateral tinnitus ears.

CONCLUSION

The pathogenesis and optimum management of tinnitus are still unclear. It often occurs with primary ear disease, usually associated with hearing loss, but may occur in patients with normal hearing. Observed changes in auditory brainstem and middle latency responses indicate central auditory alterations. Tinnitus involves both peripheral and central activity, and complete audiological and neurophysiological investigation is required. Management should be based on both audiological and neurophysiological findings.

摘要

引言

耳鸣是一种令人困扰的症状,通常是耳鼻喉科转诊的主要原因。它通常与各种病因导致的听力损失相关,被认为始于耳蜗,随后出现中枢活动异常。我们推测无听力损失的耳鸣可能由中枢和皮层下异常以及外毛细胞功能改变引起。

目的

比较有耳鸣和无耳鸣的听力正常个体的听觉脑干反应、中潜伏期反应及耳声发射。

方法

测定25名有耳鸣的听力正常受试者(年龄18 - 45岁)的听力学测试结果,并与对照组进行比较。

结果

在研究组耳鸣耳与对照组耳之间,发现如下差异具有统计学意义:I波潜伏期延长、V波缩短、I - III和I - V峰间潜伏期绝对值缩短、Na波和Pa波振幅增大、畸变产物耳声发射和瞬态诱发耳声发射信噪比。单侧耳鸣耳与双侧耳鸣耳之间无统计学显著差异。

结论

耳鸣的发病机制和最佳治疗方法仍不清楚。它常与原发性耳部疾病同时发生,通常与听力损失相关,但也可能发生在听力正常的患者中。观察到的听觉脑干和中潜伏期反应变化表明中枢听觉改变。耳鸣涉及外周和中枢活动,需要进行全面的听力学和神经生理学检查。治疗应基于听力学和神经生理学检查结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验