Suppr超能文献

FOLFIRINOX 对比吉西他滨治疗转移性胰腺癌。

FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

机构信息

Nancy University and Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Nancy, France.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data are lacking on the efficacy and safety of a combination chemotherapy regimen consisting of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) as compared with gemcitabine as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 342 patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1 (on a scale of 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of illness) to receive FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, 85 mg per square meter of body-surface area; irinotecan, 180 mg per square meter; leucovorin, 400 mg per square meter; and fluorouracil, 400 mg per square meter given as a bolus followed by 2400 mg per square meter given as a 46-hour continuous infusion, every 2 weeks) or gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter weekly for 7 of 8 weeks and then weekly for 3 of 4 weeks. Six months of chemotherapy were recommended in both groups in patients who had a response. The primary end point was overall survival.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 11.1 months in the FOLFIRINOX group as compared with 6.8 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.73; P<0.001). Median progression-free survival was 6.4 months in the FOLFIRINOX group and 3.3 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for disease progression, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.59; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 31.6% in the FOLFIRINOX group versus 9.4% in the gemcitabine group (P<0.001). More adverse events were noted in the FOLFIRINOX group; 5.4% of patients in this group had febrile neutropenia. At 6 months, 31% of the patients in the FOLFIRINOX group had a definitive degradation of the quality of life versus 66% in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.70; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX was associated with a survival advantage and had increased toxicity. FOLFIRINOX is an option for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and good performance status. (Funded by the French government and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00112658.).

摘要

背景

在转移性胰腺癌患者中,奥沙利铂、伊立替康、氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸(FOLFIRINOX)联合化疗方案与吉西他滨作为一线治疗相比,其疗效和安全性的数据尚缺乏。

方法

我们将 342 例东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分为 0 或 1 分(评分为 0 到 5 分,分数越高表示疾病越严重)的患者随机分配,分别接受 FOLFIRINOX(奥沙利铂 85mg/m²体表面积;伊立替康 180mg/m²;亚叶酸 400mg/m²;氟尿嘧啶 400mg/m² 作为推注,随后 2400mg/m² 持续输注 46 小时,每 2 周 1 次)或吉西他滨 1000mg/m² 每周 7 天,然后每周 3 天,持续 4 周。两组患者在有反应的情况下均推荐接受 6 个月的化疗。主要终点为总生存期。

结果

FOLFIRINOX 组的中位总生存期为 11.1 个月,而吉西他滨组为 6.8 个月(死亡风险比,0.57;95%置信区间 [CI],0.45 至 0.73;P<0.001)。FOLFIRINOX 组无进展生存期的中位值为 6.4 个月,吉西他滨组为 3.3 个月(疾病进展风险比,0.47;95%CI,0.37 至 0.59;P<0.001)。FOLFIRINOX 组客观缓解率为 31.6%,而吉西他滨组为 9.4%(P<0.001)。FOLFIRINOX 组不良反应更多;该组 5.4%的患者出现发热性中性粒细胞减少症。在 6 个月时,FOLFIRINOX 组有 31%的患者生活质量明确下降,而吉西他滨组为 66%(风险比,0.47;95%CI,0.30 至 0.70;P<0.001)。

结论

与吉西他滨相比,FOLFIRINOX 可延长生存期并增加毒性。FOLFIRINOX 是治疗转移性胰腺癌和体能状态良好患者的一种选择。(由法国政府和其他机构资助;临床试验.gov 编号,NCT00112658)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验