Suppr超能文献

在软组织和骨病变中使用经皮前核心活检设备的经验。

Experience with a frontal core biopsy device in soft tissue and bone lesions.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.

出版信息

Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Apr;41(4):447-58. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1191-6. Epub 2011 May 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and cost of a new frontloading biopsy system, Spirotome® (system 1), in musculoskeletal lesions, and to compare the results with those obtained with commonly used biopsy devices.

METHODS

System 1 was used in all soft tissue lesions (STL) and osteolytic bone lesions (OBL) of patients who presented at our department for CT-guided biopsy between January 2009 and June 2010. Accuracy and cost were compared to those of Bonopty® (system 2) and Tru-cut (system 3) procedures.

RESULTS

The efficacy of system 1 was 85% in STL and 89% in OBL. The procedure was well tolerated and caused no complications. System 3 had an efficacy of 84% in STL and OBL combined. The efficacy of system 2 in OBL was 85%. The cost of single-use system 1 and system 2 was comparable, the cost of system 3 and multiuse system 1 compared to single-use system 1 was 25 and 7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of system 1 in biopsy of STL and OBL was better than that of system 3. In OBL, the efficacy of system 1 was better than that of system 2. In STL at hazardous locations and small OBL with a thin cortical shell, system 1 offers the advantage of variable length and controlled loading. In these cases, single-use system 1 was cost-effective when compared to surgical biopsy. The cost per procedure of multiuse system 1 was lower than of system 3.

摘要

目的

评估新型前置式活检系统 Spirotome®(系统 1)在肌肉骨骼病变中的疗效和成本,并将结果与常用活检设备进行比较。

方法

在 2009 年 1 月至 2010 年 6 月期间,我们科室对所有软组织病变(STL)和溶骨性骨病变(OBL)患者进行 CT 引导下活检时,均使用系统 1。对准确性和成本与 Bonopty®(系统 2)和 Tru-cut(系统 3)的结果进行比较。

结果

系统 1 在 STL 中的有效性为 85%,在 OBL 中的有效性为 89%。该程序耐受性良好,无并发症。系统 3 在 STL 和 OBL 联合时的有效性为 84%。系统 2 在 OBL 中的有效性为 85%。一次性使用系统 1 和系统 2 的成本相当,系统 3 和多次使用系统 1 的成本与一次性使用系统 1 相比分别为 25%和 7%。

结论

系统 1 在 STL 和 OBL 活检中的疗效优于系统 3。在 OBL 中,系统 1 的疗效优于系统 2。在危险部位的 STL 和皮质薄的小 OBL 中,系统 1 具有可调节长度和可控加载的优势。在这些情况下,与手术活检相比,一次性使用系统 1 具有成本效益。多次使用系统 1 的每个程序的成本低于系统 3。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验